Talk:Jett Williams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
By definition, Jett Williams is not an 'illegitimate' child. She was born out of wedlock, but that is not, by itself, enough to deem her, in any legal sense, 'illegitimate'. If a father acknowledges paternity, or a court deems that the child in question is the offspring of said person, both of which conditions were met here, the said child is by rights, the legally recognized product of a marriage or relationship. Not being married to the child's mother does not, by itself, make one illegitimate. A simple act like naming the child in your will as your son or daughter has the same force of law being married to the child's mother at time of birth.
[edit] DNA test?
I've read that Jett has refused DNA testing to prove her heritage. Does anyone have any more information? - Robbstrd 10:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)