User talk:Jer10 95
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
 |
 |
||||
| User | Talk | Contribs | Count | My Sandbox | Userboxes | My Timeline |
 |
Please note: Comments left by anonymous editors may be removed without warning. Please create an account or log in if you wish to engage in a meaningful discussion. |
 Archives |
|---|
Welcome! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
Contents |
[edit] IfD discusions
Hi. You are receiving this message because you participated in the IfD discusion for either Image:42650801_planelong_ap416.jpg, Image:Adam_Air_Flight_172.jpg, or both. I felt you might be interested in participating in the discusion regarding two similar images that have recently been nominted for deletion, here and here. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 17:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Soyuztma10patch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Soyuztma10patch.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Space shuttle Columbia disaster
Hi there! Sorry to hear about all the vandalism on the article, but if you could submit requests for page protection here next time? Thanks! Blast 05.04.07 0452 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Jer10 95! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] vandal
oi, you really pissed off a guy today :-) 10 vandalisms in 11.38 minutes :-) cheers, West Brom 4ever 00:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bryan Danielson
Please check the edit history of the page, this article has been stubbed by an administator. Please revert your edit. Thanks. One Night In Hackney303 02:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Gamma Phi Beta
Hey I noticed that you reverted a legitimate response that I left on the Gamma Phi Beta talk page for another user. [1] I'm sure it was an accident, but I thought I would just let you know anyway. I have reverted your revert to reinstate my comment. --ImmortalGoddezz 02:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User Talk Lmcelhiney
Hi,
Just curious why you might have reverted edits that I was making to my own User page with VP?
Thanks for responding.
Take care,
Larry --Lmcelhiney 02:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Times Square popular culture section
I removed the Times Square popular section, because I felt that it had become an indiscriminate collection of information, which Wikipedia is not. You then reverted my edit, perhaps thinking it vandalism. I would appreciate it if you made an argument for your actions on the Times Square Talk page. I fail to see the noteability of the items in the popular culture section. For example, that a few Friends episodes took place there, how is that relevant to Times Square? Or that scenes in videogames take place there? The single point that I do feel carry some noteability, the "Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve"-reference, is already included in the "New Year's Eve in Times Square" section of the article.
As the article mentions, the "The Times Square neighborhood, notably its busiest intersection, has been featured countless times in literature, on television, and in films." Do you feel that all these countless references be listed in this section of the article? Clearly, a list of "countless" items is unmanageable. Dr bab 03:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
