Talk:Jeremy (song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article is part of the Alternative music WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Video on Single Video Theory DVD
I don't know why the article says this, I have the DVD and it's not on it. Unless someone can show it is on the DVD the comment should be removed from the article. JedEgan 00:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] MTV 25th Anniversary
They showed the "Jeremy" music video on MTV this morning.
[edit] Video description?
I think that a minute-by-minute description of the video is totally unnecessary. A synopsis would suffice. Xander 17:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
I disagree. I think that the video description is great. It is hard to completely understand it without watching it, and this description is the next best thing.(some guy)
I also disagree. I like it. Such an iconic video deserves thiskind of description. How come the lyrics are not written somewhere in the article??--201.114.96.112 21:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Including the full lyrics would probably be copyright infringement. Itub 13:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I've cut the blow-by-blow description of the video. It really was excessive (over 1,300 words, and about 50% of the entire article), contained some POV descriptions, and quoted such a large portion of the lyrics that I fear it may have been in violation of fair use. This description would be great on a PJ fan site, but isn't really appropriate here. CKarnstein 05:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] [edit] The original low-budget video
Could someone please put up a reference link for this fact. I personally havent come across any site that validates this fact.
I am the user who deleted the "lives on in bootlegs" sentence and replaced it with "(See link below for video.)" I did this because I expended needless effort trying to find the "bootleg" only to realize the article contained a link to the video on the director's website, in that case it hardly qualifies as a "bootleg" My "See link below" has since been removed. As far as "putting up a reference link for validation", isn't a link to the video proof of its existence?
