Jehovah's Witnesses and the United Nations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of a series on
Jehovah's Witnesses
About Jehovah's Witnesses
Demographics
History
Organizational Structure
Governing Body
Faithful and Discreet Slave
Legal Instruments
Government Interactions
Beliefs
Beliefs and Practices
Eschatology
Blood · Disfellowshipping
Persecution
Controversy
Related People
Formative Influences
C.T. Russell · William Miller · N.H. Barbour
Jonas Wendell
Presidents & Members
List of Jehovah's Witnesses
M.G. Henschel
J.F. Rutherford · F.W. Franz
D.A. Adams · N.H. Knorr
Former Jehovah's Witnesses
R. Franz
This box: view  talk  edit

Since 1919, Jehovah's Witnesses (known as Bible Students until 1931) have taught in their publications that the League of Nations and later the United Nations were set up as a counterfeit of God's Kingdom. Their second president, Joseph F. Rutherford, condemned politicians, business leaders and clergy in their support of the League of Nations. In 1942, Nathan Knorr, their third president, predicted that after World War II the disbanded League of Nations would be resurrected. The current view is that the United Nations will soon destroy all other religions, eventually also turning on Jehovah's Witnesses.

Contents

[edit] History of Jehovah's Witness' teaching

At a convention of Bible Students held in September 1919, the local press reported J. F. Rutherford's comments on the League of Nations: "He declared a League of Nations formed by the political and economic forces, moved by a desire to better mankind by establishment of peace and plenty would accomplish great good, and then asserted that the Lord's displeasure is certain to be visited upon the League, because the clergy--Catholic and Protestant--have abandoned his plan and endorsed the League of Nations, haling it as the political expression of Christ's kingdom on earth."[1] Rutherford’s view was similarly held by other pre-millennialist expositors of that era.[2]

The new Bible Student journal Golden Age similarly referred to the “professional politician” and the “financial powers” and the “clergy” as an “unholy trinity” in support of the League of Nations and predicted its demise: “Since these two classes [politicians and financial] are presumed to be worldly men who never claimed to have made a covenant with God, he might not interfere with them for a time, but chiefly because of the other member of the unholy trinity—the clergy—God indicates that he will not permit the League of Nations and league of churches to endure.”[3] In 1930, Rutherford published the booklet Prohibition and the League of Nations-Born of God or the Devil, Which? The Bible Proof which concluded: “Here is the positive and unqualified statement from Jehovah God that neither the League of Nations nor any other combination of men and governments shall have anything to do with the setting up of his kingdom and establishing peace and righteousness. It is God’s kingdom, and not man’s; and for men to assume to do what God has declared he will do is a gross, presumptuous sin. The nation organization that attempts to run ahead of God and presumptuously attempts to set up a rule or organization and call it God’s kingdom will suffer severe punishment.”[4]

[edit] Current View of Jehovah's Witnesses on the United Nations

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that the United Nations is the "image of the wild beast" referred to in Revelation 13:1-18 and the fulfillment of the "disgusting thing that causes desolation" from Matthew 24:15. (Watchtower 1 May 1999 p. 14) Jehovah's Witnesses believe that Jehovah will use the United Nations to destroy "false religion" as an institution; that all institutionalized religions except Jehovah's Witnesses will be destroyed. It is expected that the United Nations will then turn against Jehovah's Witnesses to destroy them, but Jehovah will intervene and destroy all political elements. They believe this act of divine intervention will be Armageddon, the final part of the "Great Tribulation."

[edit] 1963 Resolution

In 1963 Jehovah's Witnesses adopted a Resolution establishing the official view of the United Nations. The Resolution was published in the November 15, 1963 issue of Watchtower. At 24 assemblies held throughout the year, a total of 454,977 convention attendees adopted the Resolution.

Regarding the United Nations, paragraph 5 of that resolution states, "the nations further refused the surrender of their sovereignty to God’s Messianic kingdom by setting up ... the United Nations, ....This international organization stands for world sovereignty by political men. For years men without faith in God’s kingdom have endeavored to get all people to worship this international image of human political sovereignty as the best hope for earthly peace and security, in fact, the last hope for humanity. To date 111 nations have given worship to this political image by becoming members of it. However, we, as witnesses of the Sovereign God Jehovah, will continue refusing to engage in such idolatrous worship..."

[edit] Associate membership to the UN Department of Public Information

Due to the rules of the United Nations charter, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), such as the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, cannot become members of the United Nations. They can however associate with one of its sections. The Watchtower Society became an Associate member of the United Nations Department of Public Information (UN/DPI) in February of 1992 and maintained this membership until October 2001.[5]In a letter dated August 4, 2004, the UN website explains the association it had with the Watchtower Society: "By accepting association with DPI, the organization agreed to meet criteria for association, including support and respect of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations and commitment and means to conduct effective information programmes with its constituents and to a broader audience about UN activities."[6]The official UN/DPI Web page explains about associated organizations: “Please note that association of NGOs with DPI does not constitute their incorporation into the United Nations system, nor does it entitle associated organizations or their staff to any kind of privileges, immunities or special status.”[7]

[edit] References

[edit] External links