User talk:Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Archive11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This is the eleventh talk archive. See the main archive index here.

Don't add to this page (not that you can, actually). For the active talk page for Jeffrey O. Gustafson go here.

Contents

MUNGARU MALE

Please restore Mungaru Male page Mungaru male is a south indian hit movie running sucessfully all over Karnataka state. Please restore the same. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.31.11.57 (talk • contribs).

No. The previous versions of the articles contained copyright violations and frankly looked like shit and was completely unreadable. The article will need to be rewritten from scratch in an encyclopedic manner. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 11:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

University of the Philippines - Baguio and University of the Philippines, Baguio

Since it seems you deleted these articles a few times already, could you check them again and if it appears it is still a copyvio, delete them? Thanks! -- lucasbfr talk 10:36, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. The problems with the pages he wrote were that he started with blatant copyvio and built from there. He had good edits mixed in, but what was left was still too tainted to use. Normally one just reverts to the last good edit, but as he started the articles, that wasn't possible. I tried working with him, but he ignored my messages and had to be blocked after recreating material. He is now appearing to use sock puppets... hooray. Thanks again. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 12:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Babylon 5

Just wanted to say I got a kick out of this. :) Cheers, Fang Aili talk 20:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Awesome... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 21:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Terra Bite

Don't see why this was deleted without warning. The business was notable for its novel business model, as evidenced by the worldwide news coverage it had received. -- Brianhe 21:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... I have restored and put on AfD. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 21:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

SIMUN

Hi I see that you deleted Singapore Model United Nations due to cv. I followed the link and saw that page actually had the same content as one of the subsections in that article. Since I put it there, I am truly sorry. I did not copy and paste from that site, all I did was putting up some information a friend claimed he wrote about SIMUN. Also, beside that subsection, all other subsections are NOT cv so why did you delete the article as a whole without warning? You could have done:

1. Gave a warning and me or somebody else would fix it.

2. deleted the cv part, leave everything else as it is.

You see that SIMUN is a important part of high school students' lives in Singapore, I think it is critical to have that article up. Please reply on my talk.--Jingshen 23:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The copyvio would still be in the history. A better issue worth addressing is why you are working at the behest of other editors. Do you often post material written by other people that may be copyright violations? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
'The copyvio would still be in the history', that's an interesting claim. If a spammer or spambot comes on and puts a copyvio onto every article, would you delete them all??
In Singapore, the School and Starhub (home) proxy IP addresses have been blocked. My friends at school are unable to edit or create accounts. We have worked hard to merge articles together. It is not me copying from other people's works. My edits reflect the work of many of my fellow friends and even teachers.--Jingshen 23:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I sincerely suggest that you restore that article along with the logo I uploaded with permission, I see that you deleted it since it was orphaned. thanks --Jingshen 23:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Or what? How 'bout this: I sincerely suggest you write an original article from scratch. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thats what I have always done. I started from scratch and people contributed to the articles I construct. And I move it to a real article. I do not check every single word my friends write for me for copyvios because I trust them. We are all faithful editors of Wikipedia and we should not be turned down for our efforts.--Jingshen 23:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
I am sorry, but your case is just getting worse. You are the only author in the deleted history. That means all the authors of the page are not receiving credit which is in blatant violation of the GFDL and thus our policies and procedures. The proper way of doing it is to create the page, and if your buddies want to ad to it, the come to the article and hit edit like everyone else. If what you are saying is true, then that article and every other article you have written has been in violation of our policies.
So, if you are submitting articles other people wrote, then you are in violation of our policies. If you wrote the whole thing yourself, then you are in violation of our policies because of the CV. Either way, something is very wrong and worrying... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi again Jeffrey. First I would like to say thanks for letting me know the relevant policies. I am really new and not very knowledgeable so I guess I will have to flip through the policies when I get the time. I have been chasing people for answers at school today and this is what I got:
1. First I went through the old history and found the person who sent me the paragraph that was subjected to copyvio. I was very pissed at her but she actually said it was her who constructed that page for Lycée Français de Singapour. She was the orginal owner of the content and she told me that she was the head of the Press Corps last year for SIMUN 2006.
First, Irrelevant. Second, You can't prove it.
2. With all that she said, I approached the model UN coordinators and the participants of SIMUN, they confirmed that she was the head of the press corps last year.
First, Irrelevant. Second, You can't prove it.
3. Then I went onto the site again, I browsed through and found "Lycée Français de Singapour © 2005" at the bottom of [1]. To me this means LFS had the copyright of the page.
Irrelevant.
4. I then emailed the webmaster and he said it was an mistake, that page was intended to use the copyright template to make it more professional, but LFS did not write that page. So I chased them again and they removed that tag.
First, Irrelevant. Second, You can't prove it.
so now this page should be free from the copyright of the LFS. The reason I am doing this chasing around is I like to contribute to Wikipedia because it helped me loads in research and other things. I do want to pay it back. and now as you can see the page that originally hosted the content is not copyrighted by LFS. It belongs to the original author who contributed to my page. Can you advise me on what to do next? I really want to find a way to restore that page under legitimate means so maybe you can help. all that for making wikipedia better. I also believe that Wikipedia does not give copyright or credit to the people (like me) who post the things onto it. So I don't think there's a problem with contributing in a group. It just adds to the quality of Wikipedia. Please help me if you can :-> --Jingshen 12:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
No, no, no. You have ignored everything I said. You must write an original page. Anything you submit must not have been written by anyone else. Period. That you seem to fail to understand this is distressing and puts all of your further edits into question. You want to help the encyclopedia? Don't break our rules. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Epocrates

Wikipedia Entry Newbie here. Not sure why the entry was deleted. I believe it's of value for the merge between technology, physicians, and healthcare. Please advise on properly Wikifying the entry. Much appreciated. Thanks -- Epocrates 09:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

It was deleted for being an ad. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

mydbaccess

Jeffrey,

as you repeatedly removed my GFDL wiki on the above open source product on notability grounds, I guess I could use some help here about what exactly the bother is. I find similar concepts and products have been described in this encyclopedia, so why not this one?

Your help is much appreciated. Thanks, Zickermann 19:31, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Weird Question...

Saw your RfA, but I didn't want to put this question there. I was checking around and was looking at the deleted history of your user page from 2005. User:Scm83x was the first person to make edits to your user page, edits that included biographical info. Is Scm83x an alternate account of yours? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 03:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Short answer: Nope, just a friend of mine.
As for my complete early history here: I dropped in anonymously starting in 2004, though it was very rare that I actually made an edit. In the summer of 2005, I was abroad, and Scm83x asked me to snap a few photos to place on Wikipedia. I sent him a few photos in e-mails, which he subsequently uploaded, using his own account — I had licensed the photos under the GFDL in an e-mail to him. In late August of 2005, I finally started using my own account to upload higher-resolution versions of those photos; you can see that my first edits came on 28 Aug 2005, adding photos to Cádiz. I suppose my user page was a red link, though I didn't think too much of it at the time. Anyway, Scm83x helped guide me around at the beginning, and put down a little blurb about me on my user page, along with a logo from a Web site I ran at the time (if I remember correctly; I can't see the deleted edits). — Rebelguys2 talk 04:16, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

deletion of a balladeer

Hi, according to an admin, you deleted the article I started about the Dutch musical group a balladeer. I think I (and the Wikipedia community) can make the article better. Could you please restore the article, so I can work on it in the future? Thanks a lot. --Soetermans 15:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The Ballad of Rick Tugman

Dear Mr. Gustafson:

I'm writing you as a courtesy to get some information from you about a article you tagged. I created and article for a co/worker of mine on his computer in our office which unfortunately you thought he created. The article was for Rick Tugman who has been working in the television industry for 35 years. He is well respected in the industry and truthfully, I don't see the difference between this article and an article let's say for someone like Amber MacArthur who is a technology person from Canada. In fact there are plenty of articles about people all over Wikipedia, what makes those more special? I created Mr. Tugman's user page where the information for his article came from. I copied that text and his photo into the article I created. It is not an autobiograhpy as you stated, since Mr. Tugman had nothing to do with actually writing or creating this article. I created based on his well respected position and knowledge in the television industry.

I hope you can kindly accept this article as someone who works very hard to bring many people the television programming you see most everyday.

I also must apologize for deleting your tags a few days ago. I didn't know what they were about when I created the article and when came back to edit the page. I understand a little more now.

Thank you for your kind consideration. I truly appreciate your assitance in getting this resolved.

Sincerely,

Louis Keeber (Actually User:Rick Tugman, see [2])

Just because you were on his computer does not mean in the least that you had to register in his name. See, you have a choice of user names. Anything you want. To choose a name of an individual you claim to be notable is in violation of our policies. To that end you have been blocked. If you are indeed Rick Tugman, and you utterly lied about the above, than the article is an autobiography, and you are attempting to deceive and cover up. Either way, you are in the wrong. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Gustafson:

I have created a user account per your comment. What I think is unfair is that you took it upon yourself after I explained the situation to make assumptions about the article without having the facts to backup your claim. With all due respect sir, your attitude is not necessary. Mr Tugman did not write this article, but I had the rights to use the picture which Mr. Tugman had used when the account was originally created. I would respectufully request that you put back what you deleted because your facts are not correct. I asked Mr. Tugman about the previous page which he did start a page years ago, but never finished it himself because of your rules. Mr. Tugman had given me permission to use his picture and user page, but I will refrain from that in the future if that is your wish.

I would also like to know how your rules apply to some but not others. I asked you a question last night which you avoided answering. How is the other people you think are notable are not given the same treatment? As I mentioned there are numerous pages on Wikipedia about people who also read like autobiographies.

Mr. Tugman was noted in the Who's Who of Broadcasting and has given of his time to many who have wanted to work in the industry. For you to assume that I am Mr. Tugman is just unbelieveable. I'm not trying to be mean, but your attitude is not called for and I would respectuflly ask that you correct what actions you took because they are not necessary because your facts are only assumptions which are totally false.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Louis Keeber

See, the strange thing is, you say you are not Rick Tugman. The page that Tugman started was on the (now deleted) user page at User:Rick Tugman. Tugman created that page in October 2005. In actuality it was an article that was deleted and moved on to his user page.
Then, in March of 2007 you come along, log in as User:Rick Tugman, and with User:Rick Tugman's account, copy the autobiography from User:Rick Tugman on to Rick Tugman.
All the while, you are claiming not to be Rick Tugman despite the fact that you admit Rick Tugman wrote the page in October 2005 as User:Rick Tugman, and despite the fact that you were editing this month as User:Rick Tugman.
Simply being on his computer does not automatically log you in as him, especially if he had not otherwise edited in a year and a half. So if you were not him, and somehow got a hold of his password, does he know you were impersonating him and getting his account blocked? Do you frequently take over other user's accounts, pretending to be them until you get caught?
I'm sorry, but you can claim all you want that you are not Rick Tugman, but the readily available evidence definitively proves otherwise.
And since you keep complaining about it, the Rick Tugman article was deleted per community consensus and thus our policies. I simply redeleted it to keep in line with the previous community discussion on the Rick Tugman article. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 20:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Gustafson,

You deleted something because of something I did. Not Rick Tugman. You keep making assumptions. Addtionally, I am not complaining as you wrote in your reply, I'm just trying to make the mistake I made right. As I told you and you seem to ignore, Mr. Tugman had nothing to do with this. Yes, I had use of his account but with his permission based on what was on his "User Page" years ago. I made the changes to it this month not he from his account which I shouldn't have done according to you. I am trying to correct this that's all. He hasn't made any contribution in years as you state. It was my interest in Wikipedia that brought this about. I am not him and I wasn't trying to be him. He just said if I wanted to write something then I could. I don't think it right that I messed up his account and I would like to resolve this with you. Can I please call you to discuss this because your assuming something that just isn't true. I don't think Wikipedia is about not being truthful and you should give me the benefit of the doubt.

Thank you very much,

Louis Keeber

"Louis" - you keep thinking that I deleted the page as punishment. Please read what I wrote above. The last time Rick Tugman or you or whoever tried to introduce an article on Rick Tugman, it was deleted as a result of community consensus. My redeletion was simply an enforcement of the previous deletion from last time. If there were marked differences in the claims to notability from the 10/05 version to the 3/07 version, then I would naturally reconsider, but there are not - both versions are identical and the previous deletion (not done by me) stands. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 23:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Gustafson:

I read what you wrote. I don't know why you didn't read what I wrote. I told you that I changed Mr. Tugman's User Page this month actually only a few days ago when all this dialog started. Mr. Tugman had not changed his User Page in years and it was updated my myself just recently then I made the article on. Please read what I said more carefully and try to understand what I have explained to you. What is fair is fair, and the truth is there had not been an article on Mr. Tugman in years only his User Page. I recently attached his work from IMDB which showed a change in the notability you speak and updated his User Page but you refuse to recognize it. So your statement is not true with regards to there was no change from 05-07 and to block him is not right. Your saying there was not change is a false statement and not very honorable by you and the Wikipedia organization.

I'm juat tying to put right the wrong you did because of my error. I would kindly suggest properly checking the history because what you state here is totally out of context with the facts.

Thank you once again.

Sincerely,

Louis —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Louis keeber (talk • contribs) 02:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC).

Let me make this real short and sweet, "Louis." The article is deleted. This will not change. Your actions were in violation of policy. Done. Goodbye. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

question

Why did you delete my Eric Peters page? He is a personal friend and gave me permission to make one.

Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ashleymims (talk • contribs) 21:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC).

You have got to be kidding... In case you are serious, we have standards for inclusion, your little friend didn't meet those standards. In fact, you and your other accounts should be blocked for vandalism... --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 21:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Harrison House

Hi Jeff,

It would seem that you deleted the entry for Harrison House, a residence at the University of New Brunswick, on March 7th. Your justification was a "lack of notability".

Allow me to explain the notability of Harrison House. Constructed in 1967 in honour of a previous President of the University of New Brunswick, it quickly became famous for several of its traditions and exploits, the most notable of which is the Great Pumpkin Sacrifice. The Great Pumpkin Sacrifice is the longest-running and most famous University residence tradition in Canada. I haven't talked to a single adult who grew up in New Brunswick who is not familiar with it. The event is also used extensively by UNB in its efforts to recruit students from abroad, and as such has become quite well-known in other provinces and countries as well.

Many famous people have lived in Harrison House while earning degrees at UNB, including Shawn Graham, the current Premier of New Brunswick.

The Harrison House entry was created as a link from the page for the University of New Brunswick, under the section regarding its residences and traditions.

If housing notable people, creating notable traditions, and having an enormous effect on the development and history of a major University is not enough to make a University residence notable, then what is? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ElJulioso (talk • contribs) 05:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC).

Tokyo Watcher

About which page do you refer? Tokyo Watcher

Ueno Hidesamuroh. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 19:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Are you a administrator? Tokyo Watcher 12:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 19:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

?? Why do you miss dog photograph's being removed? Tokyo Watcher

What? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 19:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Please see right pic.！ Tokyo Watcher

Picture removed. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
10:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Ｉ　ＡＳＫ　ＹＯＵ　ＷＨＹ　ＤＩＤ　ＹＯＵ　ＭＩＳＳ　ＰＩＣＴＵＲＥ．　ＰＬＥＡＳＥ　ＡＮＳＷＥＲ　ＭＥ．Tokyo Watcher

Question4 Is there not a reason, too, and doesn't it think that to paste more than one label is unseemly?　Tokyo —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tokyo Watcher (talk • contribs) 12:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC).

I don't understand the question. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 19:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ５ 　 Ｉ　ａｍ　ｗｉｓｈｅｄ　ｔｏ　ａｎｓｗｅｒ　ｔｈｅ　ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ　ｏｆ　ｍｅ　ｔｏ　ｙｏｕ．

Ｔｏｋｙｏ　Ｗａｃｈｅｒ

Why do you keep the silence? If refusing a conversation, you will be blocked.
Tokyo Watcher

First, you need to give me time to answer. Second, I cannot be blocked for not answering, and you do not have the ability to do so anyway. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 19:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Ｉ　ｓｅｅｋ　ｔｈａｔ　ｙｏｕ　ｄｏ　ｊｕｓｔｉｃｅ．

Ｉ　ｈａｖｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｔｏ　ｃｏｎｓｕｌｔ　ｗｉｔｈ　ｔｈｅ　ｏｔｈｅｒ　ａｄｍｉｎｉｓｔｒａｔｏｒ　ｏｎ　ｔｏ　ｔｈｅ　ｃｏｎｄｕｃｔ　ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｙｏｕ　ｍｉｓｔｏｏｋ．
Ｉ　ｓｅｅｋ　ｔｈａｔ　ｙｏｕ　ｄｏ　ｊｕｓｔｉｃｅ．東京　04:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Um... Ok? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

!! ＹＯＵ　ＥＸＥＲＣＩＳＥＤ　ＹＯＵＲ　ＡＵＴＨＯＲＩＴＹ　ＡＮＤ　ＴＨＲＥＡＴＥＮＥＤ　ＭＥ．　Ｉ　ＴＨＩＮＫ　ＴＨＡＴ　ＹＯＵ　ＡＲＥ　ＵＮＤＥＲ　ＡＮ　ＯＢＬＩＧＡＴＩＯＮ　ＷＨＩＣＨ　ＤＯＥＳ　ＳＩＮＣＥＲＥ　ＣＯＭＰＡＴＩＢＬＥ，　ＡＲＥＮ＇Ｔ　ＹＯＵ？Tokyo Watcher

I am under many obligations, you just are not making it clear what you want. I warned you that removing maintenance tags or placing them at the bottom of articles violated ploicy, and continuing to do so without comment or fixing the problem would result in a block. That is all.
What you need to do is take that to heart, stop putting unnecessary Japanese characters in articles, and leave me alone. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 17:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Yawn

An editor has asked for a deletion review of G.ho.st. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. TareqM 00:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Your friend on your talk page

Hi the Tokyo person on your talk page is a bit .... unique I shall say. Don't really understand what he is saying and too many spaces between letters. I speak and read and write Japanese just let me know if you need any help and this person can send me an email and I will tell you what he is saying. (just browsing random user pages and yours funny)--Jingshen 13:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

No thanks, Jingshen. I appreciate the help, though. And by the way, I do not want to make it seem like I targeted the SIMUN page... but when I revisited it after you wrote the new version, I saw that no other Model UN had an article, so that is why I initiated the AfD. Thanks again. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 17:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Good then. Anyways Model UNs are relatively new and developing pretty rapidly. It would be lovely to see Wikipedia accepting some info on them.--Jingshen 14:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

mydbaccess again

Jeffrey,

as you repeatedly removed my GFDL wiki on the above open source product on notability grounds, I guess I could use some help here about what exactly the bother is. I find similar concepts and products have been described in this encyclopedia, so why not this one?

Your help is much appreciated. Thanks, Zickermann 14:14, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Felix, the page was written as if it was an ad. That is the first reason it was deleted. Second, there is no claim of notability. That is the second reason. Wikipedia entries on products are for notable products - Wikipedia is not a forum to advertise your product or service. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 17:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

"... a bit of a dick"

More glorious overreaction from our buds at Wikitruth. But, hey, I inspired a holiday, so its a win-win. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 17:25, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Empty user page

Hi, I like your empty user page and I'd kept mine empty for some time also. That is until yesterday however when someone decided to use mine as a talk page. I don't think I can delete mine back to a nice redlink - please could you do this for me?

Many thanks, --J2thawiki 08:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Done. Next time something like this occurs and you want it redeleted, put {{csd-u1}} on your page and it will show up on C:CSD. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 10:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

(unutilized wikispace sandbox)

  • Wikipedia:Sandbox/pastry/Ic Manufacturer logos/Full List
  • Wikipedia:Sandbox/pastry/Ic Manufacturer logos

What does (unutilized wikispace sandbox) mean, and why was it a reason for deleting. (they were edited yesterday) If this is a proper deletion, where am i supose to test out a page with fair use images on it??? ZyToggle-Case 02:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Replied on your page. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Also:

  • Wikipedia:Sandbox/Mafia

I too wonder what "unutilized wikispace sandbox" means. …Ē•L•!•Z•Ā… Spell it out! 04:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sandboxes are for test edits. All unitilized or unnecessary wikispace sandbox subpages were deleted per discussion on the Administrator's noticeboard. The only subpages kept were ones that had previously survived MfD. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Some A7

Hello Jeffrey. I believe that you edited out the kadis and sean article. I was not yet finished editing it down. You canceled the article at the same time that i was resubmitting the article. Kadis and Sean/RozMusic are major music producers in the recording industry. While their productions are sited within various Wikipedia articles, to date they have not been given credit or an aticle. I belive one was created a year or so ago, but was eventually deleted.

If the current article does not suffice, please provide guidance. Their peers are here and they should be also. Also, how do you upload a photo and bio section.

Warm Reagrds,

Teachwell

Zy

I decided to procrastinate on sleeping and help you out with a couple dozen deletions.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:11, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I noticed. Thanks a zillion! --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, I had some practice tonight.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Jeepers, thats a lot of Yugioh. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:20, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sandbox In-sand-ity

This article was part of a special collection of WP:BJAODN, as shown here. Please undo your action. ffm ✎talk 16:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

I will be more than happy to restore and move it to Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense/Sandbox In-sand-ity. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, that would be great. ffm ✎talk 22:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I've moved the content and history and deleted the redirects, so the link at BJAODN may need fixing. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
I'll just do it next time I am using AWB. Thanks again! ffm ✎talk 22:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, it seemes you also deleted Wikipedia:Sandbox In-sand-ity/Archive1 and Wikipedia:Sandbox In-sand-ity/Archive2 and Wikipedia:Sandbox In-sand-ity/Archive3. Could you resotre those also to the new link format? ffm ✎talk 18:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Support per nom.

Regarding your question in Anynobody's RfA: Support doesn't have to be justified like an oppose vote. It's the usual thing to do, unless I see one or more valid reasons to oppose. May I ask why you strongly oppose based on a lack of process experience? Are there civility issues or a history of disruptiveness/vandalism? I suggest you come up with diffs of such in order to explain your strong oppose, and to convince other editors of serious doubts you may have, beyond edit countitis. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Who on Earth are you to tell me to further qualify my opinion when I have already made it clear? The user is hideously unqualified. Period. It needs to be said with 100 foot neon signs to anyone thinking of voting support. That isn't possible, of course, so an adjective will have to suffice. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 10:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
No need for incivilites. I only suggested there may be more effective ways to convey the reasons for your vote. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 10:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

"He picks fights like a drunk construction worker at a bar..." Bloody WikiTruth. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 13:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Am I an idiot, in your opinion? —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../j/e/f/User_talk%7EJeffrey_O._Gustafson_Archive11_fdfe.html"