Talk:Jeffrey Sebelia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

1 Jeff being sued
2 Citing Sources
3 Vandalism
4 Cleanup, monitor
5 Minor changes

[edit] Jeff being sued

Hey, what happened to the info about Jeff leaking that he won the competition before it was officially announced. PR was saying they were going to sue him.

So what happened? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.174.73.184 (talk) 07:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Are there any articles or links about this?? Lizzybeth99 16:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Citing Sources

I've reverted the page back to its format at 02:40 on October 4th, which leaves the changes that SweetNSpicyGal keeps making, but asks for sources of her research. This is an encyclopedia; it is perfectly reasonable to expect all information in an article be verifiable.

I also deleted the paragraph in the "notes" section, as that is not a place to have a discussion about the issue, and put back the HTML that cites the source of information about Sebelia's neck tattoo.

Just made a minor change regarding the neck tattoo. The Italian phrase "l’amor de la mia vita" translates to "the love of my life" not "is the..." The citation says Sebelia says his son is the love of his life, but not that the tattoo is a direct translatin of such. It's nit picky but just wanted to explain why I removed the "is" Pnkrockr 14:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

If there is an interesting link for other information on Sebelia, it is appropriate to list that as "Extenal Reading". mel21clc 17:59, 4 October 2006 (EST)

[edit] Vandalism

Apparently SweetNSpicyGal feels very proprietary about this article, because she persists in reverting it to her original version, complete with incorrect facts, missing links, links to websites that no longer exist, spelling and grammatical errors, and incorrect formatting. What steps can be taken to stop her? TOM 12:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

- SweetNSpicyGal continues to revert this article back to her error-riddled version both anonymously and under the newly-created ID Ghtx. I have sent this to mediation for resolution. TOM 19:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Apparently SweetNSpicyGal believes because she created this article nobody is permitted to amend it. She continues to revert my changes to her original version, which 1) does not conform to Wikipedia formatting, 2) is missing links throughout the article, 3) contains incorrect links ("ecstasy" is just one example of several), 4) uses photos with no sources, 5) inexplicably includes links to websites with no relation to Sibelia (he left the group Lifter years ago), 6) and contains grammatical and spelling errors. Furthermore, she seems to rely heavily on data gathered from Sibelia's alleged MySpace page. It is my understanding these cannot be considered reliable sources since their ownership can't be proven.

I'm not sure why a person who has been involved with Wikipedia for less than three weeks would be so unwilling to accept a corrected version of her original submission. I have submitted this to mediation and politely asked SweetNSpicy Gal to refrain from making changes until the matter is resolved, but she has ignored every message I've sent her via her talk page. TOM 13:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Reading WP:DR would help. Additionally I think Wikipedia:No personal attacks is adequate. Phoe 14:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Would an administrator please advise SweetNSpicyGal that it is not appropriate to remove postings from the Discussion page? Thank you. TOM 12:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup, monitor

I've cleaned the article up, ID'd where citations are still needed. I'll be closely monitoring behaviour of all editors for this point on. If anyone chooses to maliciously edit the article, without reasonable justification mentioned in the edit summary, they will be warned against it. I will block people for a day, then three days, then a week at a time, if they edit maliciously. -- Zanimum 15:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Phoe 17:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)