Talk:Jeffboat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jeffboat is within the scope of WikiProject Louisville, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Template Usage] [Watch Project Articles] [Project Talk]
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.

Since I live only 3-4 blocks away, I'm pretty much forced to have wrote this article. Should I write a separate article for the Howard SHipyards, or include it here? I have a pic of the old shipyards from the Baird's book, but it is just as "high-quality" as the other pics I took from that book.--Bedford 20:25, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I think they were distinct businesses, so I would say they each deserve an article. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 21:08, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inconsistancies

According to http://www.aclines.com/JB/Jb_about.asp, the history behind Jeffboat does not seem to match what is in this article. Will have to do some more research and find better info. Supersquid 09:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "belly of the beast"

I have worked at jeffboat as a machinist for a number of years, and was involved in the "wildcat", and subsequent labour actions, including the recent decert campaign: The "labour update" was mine, written before I had a login. My question is this: Why was my text edited? All "facts" were supported by independent McMedia articles (Courier-Journal and the local Jeff paper); and, as well, the final vote tally was certified by the NLRB (649-190 to retain local 89). Is the person responsible for "editing" some sort of management stooge? Perhaps a salaried or supervisory employee at Jeffboat, or some where else? If so, why is their NPOV not challenged? I realise the importance of NPOV, but when information is supported by "outside" sources......................... Wanagi49 11:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

I did the edit. I have no connection with the company in any way; I live in Alabama, though I'm familiar with Jeffboat having lived in the area for many years. I removed the old section because I believe it was heavily slanted pro-union and anti-management, which is a definite NPOV problem, and I could not find the source of the certified vote results. I stand by your right to back your union, but you must remember that Wikipedia prides itself in presenting a neutral point of view, so you must keep any editorializing to a minimum. (Believe me, I have to police myself on that many times.) If you can find a source article from the C-J or the J-ville paper (or the NLRB itself) with the results, please include a footnote/reference to the web page, and all will be well. I remind you also of this note which you will find at the bottom of the page every time you edit anything in Wikipedia: If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it. Realkyhick 04:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)