Talk:Jeannette Piccard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articles Jeannette Piccard (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] See comments
WikiProject Minnesota This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low-importance within Minnesota articles.

The following comments about the quality and importance of this article have been left: (edithistorywatchrefresh)

Free images, two Smithsonian photos, and Internet citations are in place. Rated B-class and nominated for GA. To get to A-class and FA someday, the Auguste Piccard talk page says there may be a NASA video though I could not find it at NASA or Google video 2007-02-02. -Susanlesch 14:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
Wikipedians in Minnesota may be able to help!
WikiProject Space This article is within the scope of WikiProject Space.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Related projects:
WikiProject Space exploration WikiProject Space exploration Importance to Space exploration: Low
An entry from Jeannette Piccard appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on February 1, 2007.
Wikipedia


[edit] GA passed

The article seems well written and well documented. My only suggestion is that it might be easier to read if there were less use of the single name "Piccard". I realize that it is normal in formal writing to refer to someone by last name, but when there are several people with the same last name under discussion, it gets confusing. For example, in the last paragraph of the "Family and education" section, the phrase "where Piccard was present for many of his lectures" made me wonder "How could he be absent from his own lecture"? Even in cases where it can reasonably be inferred which Piccard is being discussed, you're making the reader work harder than necessary.--Jwwalker 05:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)