User talk:Jdemarcos

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!



(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 15:16, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bon dia, Jaume, gràcies per a saludar-me. Et sembla estrany que puc defender-me en català? No és que som de tots, els unitaris universalistes? Fins aviat, Jaume. Blondlieut 23:38, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Baha'i Faith

Thanks for your NPOV contributions to this page - most appreciated! AndrewRT 16:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wicca edit

Hi. Jdemarcos. While I agree that my circumlocution could be confusing, I wanted to make a distinction between those passages that we definitely know were copied from Crowley's writings (such as the early drafts of the Drawing Down the Moon dialogue), and passages like the Rede, where the connection is assumed, but not definite. Additionally, while I'm reasonably certain that Gardner nicked the wording of the Rede from Crowley, I'm forced to the conclusion that he either disagreed with Crowley's concept of Will, or didn't quite understand it: Gardner's use of "will" in the Rede relates far closer to whim than to Thelema.

However, if you want to move my "disclaimer" to a footnote or an aside, I'll certainly not object--hey, if it makes the article better, I'm all for it. :D Justin Eiler 22:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

The new revision looks great! :D Justin Eiler 20:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! ;-) --Jdemarcos 14:54, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Youtube

Thank you for your comments. Demography is the 2nd most important issue facing humanity second to Religious understanding. How computers are used to model the potential outcomes of population growth will be important to any religion and its adherence growth. How can religion move into the XNA world of simulation. Let us see in time. But what is being discussed in the Baha'i discussion page is the birthing pains of that process. Some editors say that no youtube content will be permitted on the main page (Jeff3000). Others even say that discussion on the matter should be banned (Zazaban). Your comments are procedural and do not address the substance of the discussion on youtube. Please have a comment on youtube inclusion and how audio visual material on the net interfaces with wikipedia. I am interested in what you have to say. I am concerned how you would police the discussion matter if you do not have a pro point of view. Thank you for reading. RoddyYoung 01:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Slackbuie

Thanks for your comment regarding Juan José Tamayo. He seemed to be a notable person, so I rather hoped someone might do an entry for him. But I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so maybe that's not the right way to proceed. I notice he has an entry on the Spanish Wikipedia [1]- at least I think it's him. Although I'm interested in theological matters, I'm afraid I don't have Spanish, so it would be hard for me to write an entry about him. Best wishes, Slackbuie 19:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)