User talk:Jaysscholar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Jaysscholar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RJFJR 14:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Hip hop
Hi, see you're interested in hip hop? That's a good thing cause there is a lot of work to do here. Be bold when editing. Happy edits, Julien Tuerlinckx 10:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] playwright-stub
The {{playwright-stub}} is deprecated and in the process of being removed. In the future please use {{writer-stub}} (or one of the subtypes based on region or nationality). If the author is primarily known for writing for the theatre then also using the {{theat-stub}} is recommended. Caerwine 09:30, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Liberalism in ..
You suggested to merge a lot of articles in the liberalism in ... series in the Liberalism article. SInce this content wouldn't fit into this article and the intention of the article is totally different, I don't think this suggestion is good. Since there is no good place to discuss the item, it is better to delete the merge message. Electionworld 07:04, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- But there are articles on Elections in .., etc. It is linked to liberalism, but it doesn't fit into the main article. Electionworld 22:31, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- It would become an extreme large article. In that article there was made a choiced to refer to the national articles. I see no advantage of merging the articles. - Electionworld 22:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] all that glitters
I removed that credit because Family Business does not use a sample of the Death In Vegas song, but both that song and Family Business use the same sample from another song. I'll try to find out what that song is. --Shawn88 09:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Singer-stub-image
Hi, you uploaded Image:Singerdraw.gif and labelled it PD - very nice drawing. Did you make the drawing yourself, and released it into the public domain? I was planning to transfer it to Commons, so I can use it for a singer-stub in Swedish Wikipedia. However, to do that I need to know who made the drawing. / Habj 20:08, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
- I can't put it on commons then. Too bad. / Habj 22:48, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Black pepper changes
Hi, Jaysscholar! You should take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), which says 'Capitalise the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus "Rules and regulations", not "Rules and Regulations".' —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Centrism
I noticed you're politically centrist. You may be interested in Category:Moderate Wikipedians. Listing can, of course, be achieved by adding moderate to your babel box, or by adding {{User moderate}}, or [[Category:User moderate]]. Et cetera. firenexx 15:31, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:KClarkson.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:KClarkson.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 22:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category
Hello, I might be wrong, but I think you have put your User page into the incorrect category. Your in the category for Wikipedians from Georgia, the country in Eastern Europe. If you are in fact from Georgia the US state, you need to move yourself to Category:Wikipedians in Georgia, USA. Thank you. Philip Stevens 19:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Saadiq.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Saadiq.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 21:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:FergieP.jpg
|
Thanks for uploading Image:FergieP.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Wgfinley 13:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- In response to this from my talk page:
- Tags need to be supported with information on what the source of the image is, if there isn't a source there's no way to verify it's a promotional image. --Wgfinley 13:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- And that site appears to be an unreliable repository of copyvios (copyright holder watermarks are visible on many of them). Without a source for the image (i.e. who owns the rights to it) its an unlicensed image and not something we can use. --Wgfinley 05:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Tags need to be supported with information on what the source of the image is, if there isn't a source there's no way to verify it's a promotional image. --Wgfinley 13:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
Hello, I noticed you edited a Hip Hop related article. If you wish you can join the new Hip Hop Wikiproject. --Chubdub 16:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Bigboi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bigboi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Dre3000.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dre3000.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] J.R. Smith
Hi, I see you are editing the J.R. Smith and Tyson Chandler articles. From where did you get this information about them officially being traded? From what I read, it was a verbal agreement. It has to be verifiable before the changes reflect on wikipedia. This is not NBA Live where you can change the information and rosters as you like... please understand that you must cite your sources. Read this: Wikipedia:Citing sources thanks--203.214.43.194 13:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC) |}
[edit] zindane loop
Hey, i've updated the image and made it loop 4 times. sikander 21:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Staceydash.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Staceydash.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stacey Dash
I removed the tags because it's 3 (almost 4) paragraphs and I just don't think it qualifies as a stub. It has full information on her career, her family and other things. Does it have alot of detail? No. But for an actress who has been basically a b-list actress for most of her career, I think it's sufficient to be considered a full article. --Woohookitty(meow) 15:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation
This edit is a violation of copyright. Magazine covers may only be used to illustrate the publication of the issue of the magazine in question. Here, you are using it to depict Stuff generally. --Yamla 21:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Another copyright violation
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Image:Staceydash.jpg article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! --Yamla 21:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Feverpromo4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Feverpromo4.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. |
--Yamla 19:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unblock
The Image:Staceydash.jpg was in a magazine and I was activly trying to get the right copyright info as seen on Wikipedia_talk:Image_use_policy#Magazine_Pictures. I put the proper descrition on it and had it label has promo and was pursuing if i should put something more specific. Why ban me when I'm activly pursuing the proper identification??
I also did not upload Image:Feverpromo4.jpg. I merely took {{Jay-Z}} off of it because it did not belong.
On the Stuff magazine article, I do not think it is unreasonable for me to assume that putting a magazine cover on a article about the magazine is ok. if it should only be used for that particular issue, then tell me that and direct me to the proper wikiproject so i can discuss it with the approiate people. I think a banning is a bit harsh. It was a fair assumption on my part. Direct me to the proper project.
If you see someone who is genuinly trying to improve wikipedia and has made a couple of mistakes (one of which he was actively pursuing the proper course of action), then you should direct that user to the proper areas, not ban them.
- I've left a note for the blocking admin regarding Image:Feverpromo4.jpg. Regarding the other image and your comments regarding being able to use fiar use for magazine covers. Firstly as above we may have a fair use claim for magazine covers for use illustrating an article about the magazine, not for general use to illustrate the subject of that cover. General magazine content is the same, we could possibly have a fair use claim to illustrate the magazine itself, but not the subject of the photo. Use of promotional tags is for where the material has been released specifically for publicity purpose, although some magazine photos maybe those generally they will be photos taken specifically for the magazine and not generally released for any other use. See Wikipedia:Publicity_photos "Note that the above only applies to photos that are explicitly distributed for publicity purposes, and does not apply to most photographs of celebrities". --pgk(talk) 20:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Unblocked. I am sorry for blocking you when it turns out that you did not upload that image. However, please follow Pgk's advice above. Please do not upload images unless you are sure it would be usable. --Yamla 15:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Image:Jada Fire.jpg
You haven't responded to my question of where I should send some clips of Jada Fire's bondage video, so I'm guessing you don't really want them. If I'm mistaken, please respond soon and give me an e-mail address to send them to. Jada69 01:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Magazine pictures
You said: "thx for unblocking me. Now where do I go to figure out the correct labeling of that pic?? I asked here but noone has responded. I thought I'd asked since it seems to be your area. The pic was out of a magazine. I put promo but that seems to be wrong."
- We may not use magazine pictures from inside a magazine. There is no fair-use rationale. Barring exceptional circumstances, this would be a violation of copyright. --Yamla 16:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- You said: "Really?? What do you mean "fair-use rationale"? Anybody can pick up a mag off the stand and skim through and see it so I would assume its fair-use. You may have a better understanding though. Where would I go to argue this?"
-
-
- No, the situations are entirely different. In your example, it is debateably fair-use because at least theoretically, you are considering whether or not to buy the magazine. In the case of Wikipedia, we cannot use the image because we are not using it to depict the publication of the particular issue of the magazine (and the cover would be the appropriate image to use if we were). The magazines pay substantial amounts of money for the images that appear inside of them and they very firmly exercise their copyrights over them. We can't just go about using someone else's copyrighted material. If you are an intellectual property lawyer, I can put you in touch with Wikipedia's legal staff where you can argue the case. Otherwise, there's not really much else you can do. Wikipedia's legal staff have already ruled on this issue. --Yamla 16:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Hmmm. The cover is fair-use to describe the issue, so could the pic be fair-use to describe the person in the image? --Jaysscholar 16:50, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- No. Imagine there's a cover of, say, Playboy with Jennifer Aniston on it. And furthermore, this cover generates a lot of controversy. You could now use a scan of that cover in the article on Jennifer Anison but only in the section of the article that talks about the controversy. You could not use it as the first picture right at the top-right of the page, for example. But let us look at another cover. Jennifer Anison on the cover of Cosmo. No controversy, no discussion of that particular issue in the Jennnifer Aniston article. That image could NOT be used in the article, then, because it would simply be used to depict the person and that is not fair-use. --Yamla 17:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Ok, what about if there is a pic in a magazine and she is just simply modeling. no controversy or anything. regular modeling. can this image be used in a section describing how she has modeled in magazines, when she is mainly an actress? could the cover? could an image within the magazine? --Jaysscholar 17:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- No, such an image could not be used at all. The cover could be used if there's a specific discussion of that particular issue of the magazine. No image within the magazine could be used. --Yamla 17:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
[edit] re: Template:Infobox musical artist
Thanks, but we started implementing this template quite a while ago (you can see it on the feature articles I keep an eye on, The Supremes, The Temptations, Sly & the Family Stone, and The Jackson 5). It's going okay, although there are always problems with Wikipedia editors who think this is a personal playground or free fansite hosting. --FuriousFreddy 23:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Lupe Fiasco
Image:LupeFiascoBillboard.jpg is not discussed in the article, just mentioned. The magazine cover license says: "Note: It is not acceptable to use images with this tag in the article of the person or persons depicted on the cover, unless used directly in connection with the publication of this image." "Directly in connection" means it is a notable cover about the artist and it is widely discussed in the article of the person in the cover. -feydey 19:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Get Lost Punk
we're mindless teenagers having fun, drugged up on coke, man u need to cool it. Just coz u jealous of are FUN. Can u feel the love in the air. Man u need help. Woooooo smoke it. Peace out little dude.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrserious (talk • contribs) .
[edit] WPWikiProject Musicians
Wikipedia is in sore need of a policy on for musician pages, and you have been active in this area before. Therefore, please provide your comments and opinions on the policies there. Thanks in advance!--Esprit15d 19:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Page layout would be great.--Esprit15d 21:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiProject Basketball
[edit] Premier League Fixtures
Hello, I just wanted to let you know that future Premier League fixtures are copyrighted (see here). Only results can be posted. For now I simply removed the offending material (which can easily be retrieved from the history once the matches are completed). - Pal 20:44, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Microphone_20.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:Microphone_20.GIF. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Jadakiss.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Jadakiss.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 11:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Regina King.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Regina King.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 06:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:US Janet.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:US Janet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Mosmof 22:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:US Janet.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:US Janet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 13:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Budden.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Budden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:US Janet.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:US Janet.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)