User talk:JayKeaton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Note to posters - if I say summat to you, I will leave it on your talk page. Please be specific as I may not know what you are talking about. If you want to say summat to me I expect you to leave it on MY talk page, as I may not notice it on yours. And even if I do notice it, I may ignore it out of principle,

Archive no 1

Contents

[edit] Various edits to Talk:Steve Irwin

Thanks for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Some readers looking for a serious article might not find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. I hope you can help us out! -- Longhair 07:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I was referring to the rape comment, not the satellite phone comment. One more incident of childish immatury from yourself, and I'll be blocking you to bring a stop to it. This isn't the first time you've been warned to contribute in a mature fashion. -- Longhair 08:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Just because other editors may act in childish ways, it doesn't give you licence to act the same. Suggesting I stay out of your way is not going to work. If you continue to make disruptive edits, it's only a matter of time before you are blocked. Whether I do it or not is hardly the point. One of the many administrators surely will if you continue. What post am I supposed to have deleted? My deletion log is here if you can point me to the deletion in question I'll answer your other question. -- Longhair 10:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Nobody wants to block you. Not all of your edits are deemed unworthwhile. Just be aware, if I don't block you for acting in a childish and immature manner, somebody else may. Let's leave this be for now. We've both got some serious editing to do. -- Longhair 11:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No source

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:NathanFillion.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NathanFillion.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tlusťa 13:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unkempt * Untidy * Kempt

Umm... not really sure your redirects are that useful as they go to a disambiguation page. I wont delete tham but thought I'd just drop a note incase you were going to make more. Thanks! :)  Glen  17:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Andy tle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andy tle.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 04:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bilo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bilo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

  • Image:Keatonmask.jpg
  • Image:Keatonproof.JPG
  • Image:Keaton Drawn.JPG

Thank you. BigrTex 03:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

They aren't linked to any pages, that's fine JayKeaton 05:22, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Miller Park

Of course it was tragic. It was tragic to the families of those killed. However, it's also unencyclopedic to attach terms like that to an accident. When would a fatal accident not be tragic? Well, maybe if Hitler had been on board the Hindenburg, for example. But you were right to revert it, just not for quite the right reason. :) Wahkeenah 09:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Deaf-mute

Hi JayKeaton. Thanks for your comments on the talk page. I think it is clear by several uses of simply the term "deaf" in the the article that the preferred term is "deaf". For more detail about "what to call them" see the article Deafness. In regard to the Deaf-mute article "doesn't talk about, well anything else really", please note that it is not the article on deafness, and I refer you again to that article for much more detail about causes, treatments, and much more; and to the article List of deaf people for informaton about famous deaf people. The deaf-mute article is only a discussion of the historical but outdated term, not a comprehensive discussion of deafness. Ward3001 23:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../j/a/y/User_talk%7EJayKeaton_a375.html"