User talk:Javsav
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Reguarding Your Recent Edits
I have looked at the history of your Userspace there has only been one edit move from User:Riff Johnson. it appears that The only edit he made move was a comment about WP:NPOV policy, which was a correct statement. so your statement no attempt to research the situation whatsoever, if you had you would realise he also has added a lot of stuff to my user page. is completely inaccurate. and redarding the fact that the vandalism was on a user's page and not on the mainspace means nothing. there are countless vandals who only attack user pages.
[edit] The edit to my talk page
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! and Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Betacommand 05:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] responce
I now understand that the edits were joking. but at the time it appeared to be vandalism I will remove the warning. Betacommand 19:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your Comments
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. please do not make personal insults. Betacommand 19:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] user:Riff Johnson
no problem. just a qick reminder watch your comments, some of them that you left on my talk page was very inappropriate. Betacommand 14:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
some of them was (sic) very inappropraite???
qick (sic) ??? Javsav 15:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request to remove personal comment
Would you please remove the comment about me you made on Daniel Olsen's talk page? Moriori 09:05, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your experiment
Thank you for experimenting with the page Pholcodine on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Deon555|talk|e|Review Me! :D 07:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Wikipedia:Editor Review/Deon555
Please don't make unproductive edits to other people's reviews. Thanks, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Saying, "you are bad" is not what the review is for. It is to help editors know which areas he/she needs to improve. Saying "You are bad" does not help an editor know which area he needs to work on. If you think he needs to improve in a certain area, say so but try to be constructive. That should be easy, for someone with such a high IQ. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Point taken and retracted. I misread your comment on his talk page. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 10:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Your statement was, "You are bad." This is not a review: it is simply a personal attack and of no help to an editor seeking to improve. I have deleted your second comment, which repeated the first. If you continue merely to attack the editor, you will be blocked. Preferably, consider what part of the the editing you consider bad, why you consider it bad, and, crucially, what steps the editor can take to improve that area. If there is more than one area, then detail them separately, or, if there is general advice, then again frame that in a way that will help the editor to improve. The aim of the review is to provide a supportive response for people that need some objective insight and assistance. Tyrenius 10:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I've checked your contributions and you don't seem to have that much experience of wiki, so please read up on WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL, also WP:AGF, chill, be friendly, and happy editing! Tyrenius 11:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Omg, i'm real sorry; but i dont think that my *accidental* actions warrant this kind of behaviour, especially targeting my IQ? I was using a VP-like tool which is mega fast, idle for 10-15 seconds are ur session times out and logs off. I am really sorry for any damage i may have done, but at the end of the day, all you would have to do is Revert my changes, and ur done. I hope you read WP:NPA. Thx --Deon555|talk|e|Review Me! :D 11:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
You wrote this to me on my talk page, "Why did you feel the need to meddle with an issue that was already resolved?" Now when someone is doing their job, which I am as an admin, to enforce policy, that's rather a derogatory thing to say. The issue was not resolved, as I had to remove another statement where you'd repeated your first attack.[1] You also wrote on my talk page, "you continued to peruse my contributions in an attempt to further harass me." This might seem like an obvious truth to you, but it is not. It is, however, another personal attack. You obviously have strong emotions, as on your user page where there is a message since 18 July, "I loathe you" (which I advise you to remove). People aren't out to get you, and I'm not out to get you. I was looking at your contributions in case you were new, and I didn't want to be too harsh if you were, so it's actually the exact opposite to what you had interpreted it as. That's why I left my second note above. I was giving you an excuse, letting you off the hook a bit, making allowances that you might not be familiar with certain Wiki protocols. However, you are telling me that I'm mistaken and that you are an exprerienced and knowledgeable editor. If this is the case, then then allowances don't have to be made in the same way. Perhaps you could let me know which applies. Tyrenius 16:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Retard barnstar
Highly inappropriate. I've removed it. -- Samir धर्म 07:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe you can share your comments on the Administrators' noticeboard: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Retard barnstar -- Samir धर्म 07:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Although I agree it was inappropriate, I am going to have to go against the grain and say that it was indeed funny :) - Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 18:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Somtimes poor taste is quite funny.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 18:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Rabeprazole2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rabeprazole2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
