User talk:Jason C.K.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] *NOTICE FROM JASON C.K.*
I read a lot of articles, but other than that do not spend over-much time at Wikipedia doing other things, editing, engaging in discussion, etc. Unless you're posting on my talk page regarding something I'm currently active in, I might never notice :P If you're not sure I'm currently active on the wiki, you're better off emailing me (maybe I'll see your email amidst all my spam) AND posting on my talk page. --Jason C.K. 18:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Failed cat
Uhhh, where was the discussion on this? I notice you're moding a number of articles I was prime on, but no one ever asked me my opinion on this matter! Maury 16:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I'll respond on the category's talk page
- --Jason C.K. 16:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] iTablet
Although I am not trying to take offense at my page being deleted, I still would aprreciate if you did not. It spent hours compiling the research for this and also, if I recall correctly, there was a page on Intel powered Macs before Steve Jobs even hinted at that possibility. Please do not think I am mad. I understand that some articles need to be deleted. If you are Apple User, you must know that there has to be a Tablet in development. Even with the iPhone, patents have been taken out on a touchscreen computer with Apple software. Like I stated in the article, "With more and more architects, engineers, and designers (as well as Law Enforcement and Medics) turning to tablets for everyday use, Apple has definitely seen the potential of a Tablet PC." It will happen, it doesn't matter what steve Jobs says. But thank you. Also, i would be very delighted to start the Modbooks article, if you cold help that would be great.
-
- I replied on the iTablet talk page.
- --Jason C.K. 22:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Broken OS template
I'm the person that came looking for help...but coelacan never came back :( Can you answer my question? I still can't use the template. I'm still confused how to use the code shown on that page, and I find no explanation or examples anywhere (I'm noticing Wikipedia is a little light on examples, I wish it had more, it's a lot more clear & concise than lots of help text). When I paste in, exactly, "Mets501" (without the quotes) it clearly isn't working right. Am I supposed to write something in place of "PAGENAME"? --Jason C.K. 19:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I see the problem. The page had the wrong text. See the category page now. —Mets501 (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] iTablet
LOOK HERE AND TELL ME THERE WILL NOT BE A TABLET YOU IGNORANT FOOL!!!!!!!!!!
[edit] Jason C.K.
In one of your many comments, you said that tablets were a niche market. Well guess what Einstien, so were MP3 players! And now look!! Apple can make the products better. The Apple name and the huge Cult of Mac will create immense demand alone. Plus, Apple's 200+ patents on the touchscreen and gesture recognition are not going to be just for a cell phone. I use a Mac and I dont think that Apple would miss a chance to enter another market with that is currently a horrible mess, with miserable products and no clear market leader. Just like they did with iPod.
[edit] Accusations of bad faith.
On the Talk:Criticism_of_Microsoft#This_article_consists_heavily_of_Original_Research page you repeatedly accuse me of attempting to delete the article and then you accuse of me bad faith edits. I do not appreciate such accusations. You can't just claim bad faith when anyone disagrees with you. Please see WP:AGF. --TrollHistorian 02:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I believe I accuse you once of attempting to take apart the article by any means possible (because you keep offering changing arguments and only sometimes try to support/defend your reasoning, and only sometimes respond to the counter-points others make), and another time of giving the appearance of not discussing in good faith because you make a statement which appears to me to be insupportable (i.e.--that the article is ALL primary sources, and mis-used ones at that), I repeatedly ask you about your statement, and you just ignore my question. You're also unwilling to answer simple yes/no questions. Ok, so bad faith isn't the right term here, but you're not looking entirely to me like someone who's listening to others and responding, which rather grinds any discussion to a halt. I have been attempting to understand you, and indeed am about the only person even joining you in the discussion, but your ignoring counter-points isn't really helping. I apologized for saying you were trying to take apart the article by any means possible, but still you seem to ignore counter-points by others. That pattern doesn't give me the impression of someone who fully supports a give-and-take discussion. So no, that's not bad faith, but I don't think it's fair or productive discussion practice.
- --Jason C.K. 03:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)