User talk:Jaqu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi.
Contents |
[edit] Aaron Sorkin at FAC
Hello. I've tackled the issues you brought up about the Aaron Sorkin article. Would you mind either reinforcing your opposition to the Aaron Sorkin article on the FAC page, or striking out your opposition in favor of a Support?-BiancaOfHell 22:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Angelina Jolie revert
You reverted stating that her height cannot be confirmed; to the contrary, the height that was listed for her was the height listed at her IMDB bio [1]. Do you want to put it back, want me to put it back, or feel it's irrelevant and shouldn't be there anyway?--H-ko (Talk) 07:26, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid the IMDb is not considered a reliable source. Jaqu 18:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] input sought
In a message to several recent editors of Schiavo-related pages, I write that: Input is sought here: Talk:Government_involvement_in_the_Terri_Schiavo_case#Edit_War_between_me_and_User:Calton.
--GordonWatts 15:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wonderbra FAC
Hi, I followed you lead and edited the article to eliminate the Pop culture section. As I mentioned, I had the same instinct when we developed the article into a business history, rather than fluff piece, but I wanted to be sensitive to earlier contributions that seemed innocuous at the time. Take a look and if it works for you, perhaps you can revise you view of the article. Thanks again. Mattnad 02:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Angelina Jolie
Hi, I'd like to know why you removed: 1) "Her middle name is named after Jean Nouvel, a famous French architect who is among Pitt's favorites" in the children section in the Angelina Jolie article; 2) "Jolie has put her career on hold to stay at home and take care of her four children" [2] Since I have a link for reference; and 3) The family divide their time between Los Angeles, California and New Orleans, Louisiana. [3] Again, I have a link for reference
I understand why you removed the Golden Globes win, but I don't understand why you'd remove the above three points.--Sli723 23:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Even though USA Today reported it, the Jean Nouvel connection is pure speculation; neither Pitt nor Jolie ever commented on that. I don't think it is necessary or advisable to include it, since it is nothing but an internet rumor basically.
- Her career status shouldn't be in the "Children" section and it seems like an exaggeration, as she is far from ending her film career, she still has several projects lined up for later this year. Taking a few months of is nothing out of the ordinary and probably not notable enough to be mentioned.
- Again, it has nothing to do with Children, plus it contradicted what you put in the lead ("lives with Pitt in New Orleans").
I have no intentions to start an edit war here, I'm just trying to preserve the article's featured status. Jaqu 13:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply. I understand the reasons to why you removed the first two and I can accept that. For the third point, I have a link for reference. If it has nothing to do with Children, can you drag-and-drop the sentence to another section (e.g. Relationships)? By the way, I did not include "lives with Putt in New Orleans" in the lead and I do not know why you removed that too. I am not trying to start an argument/edit war but I am trying to improve the article. --Sli723 05:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Borat FAC
I have responses for your comments on Borat!'s FA nomination. I hope you'll take a look to get a consensus determined on what needs to be done. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 16:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
