Talk:James J. Hill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, which aims to improve all articles related to Minnesota. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Mid | This article is on a subject of Mid-importance within Minnesota articles. | |
|
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| See also: WikiProject Trains to do list | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance within the Trains WikiProject. |
- "Many people have accused James J. Hill of being a bloodthirsty
- businessman. Such would be true. However, it is unfair to condemn
- him entirely."
I wonder how well this conforms to the NPOV? I don't know enough about Hill to say. Maybe the accusation should be made specific enough that readers can judge according to their own philosophies? I suspect that maybe this is parallel to "Many people think Einstein was a brilliant physicist, but it would be unfair to condemn him entirely, since once in 1952 he was kind to a child ... ", etc. -- Mike Hardy
- It's not NPOV. Wikipedia is not in the business of saying what is fair, and "bloodthirsty businessman" is a subjective moral judgment. Compared to Bill Gates &co. he may well have been liberal-minded and fair.
And now I've deleted it. If someone wants to say James J. Hill murdered his business competitors or defrauded his employees, or to make some accusation that is specific in its content, that could be consistent with NPOV, but "bloodthirsty" lacks specificity and gives us a verdict without the facts of the case.
The wording at several points in the article should be changed to be more appropriate to an encyclopedia bio. I'll do my best to fix it up myself (as it was I who put the cleanup tag on the article.) Paul 05:36, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Canadian Pacific Railway
What about Hill's involvment with the Canadian Pacific Railway? Fawcett5 14:09, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Article style
Can someone please work on this article's style, including re-writing the phrases "His first goal? To expand and upgrade still more." and "To recap briefly". Thanks. --Jason McHuff 19:59, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] POV Violations
This article needs to be cleaned up for various glaring biases.
[edit] Monopoly extent?
The frequent references to Hill's 'monopolies' don't specify their geographic extent. Did they extend to England, San Fransisco, or was he just the only supplier in a particular town? -The Gomm 23:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
