Talk:James D. Oberweis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

Is this article maintained by the Oberweis campaign? The Chicago Tribune came right out and said that Oberweis' use of the Tribune's name in his totally faked headlines was preposterous. I dispute that these are "fake" ads, no they are fake ads without quotation marks. ArrowHead 00:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Using quotation marks or not using quotation marks is more of a matter of style, than anything else. The fact remains that the article has links to several stories that are carrying the controversy over the fake ad (and he still won't apologize for them, that was evident the other night in debates, when Topinka refused to shake his hand). All of the candidate's pages are being watched, to prevent their campaigns volunteers/staff members from distorting/misusing them. --JohnDBuell 04:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

I would rather see something like "apparently fraudulent" or "faked" as opposed to "'fake'" with the quotation marks. I think that the NPOV consensus would be that these ads were unequivocally fake. 207.112.205.210 17:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Okay, change it then! --JohnDBuell 21:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)