Talk:James Cotterill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]
WikiProject on Football The article on James Cotterill is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of football (soccer) related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Reaction to sentencing

This section only contains negative reactions, all of which are from the same source. It also contains the bizarre, contradictary statement "It happens every week in the Premiership and he was made a scapegoat because he was on TV.", which makes no sense because every Premiership match is shown on television. I think that if no balancing statements can be found then this section should be removed from the article, especially as it contains no facts, just opinions. Gasheadsteve 14:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

I unquoted the scapegoat on TV part of the quote and can I say these are NOT my views on the incident and I tried to get reactions from both sides, but the only reaction I got was from the NW Evening mail, i'm not sure that there is any comments supporting his sentence, but is there is, please add them but do cite your sources. Kingjamie 19:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
I've had a quick look around and I haven't been able to find any positive comments, all of the parties involved have been keeping quiet. I'll rename the section to Criticism of sentencing to reflect the nature of the comments, so that it's clear it's negative opinions rather than a balanced discussion. Gasheadsteve 22:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)