James Bacque
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
James Bacque is a Canadian novelist, publisher and book editor. Bacque was a mainstream fiction writer and essayist before turning his attention, in 1989, to the controversial fate of German soldiers held as POWs by the Allies after World War II. His recent works have also dealt with the French resistance. Bacque was educated at Upper Canada College in Toronto, where he was a member of Seaton's House, one of the school's boarding houses.
Contents |
[edit] Other Losses
In Other Losses (1989), Bacque claimed that Allied Supreme Commander Dwight Eisenhower deliberately caused the death of 790,000 German captives in internment camps through disease, starvation and cold from 1944 to 1949. In similar French camps some 250,000 more are said to have perished. The International Committee of the Red Cross was refused entry to the camps, Switzerland was deprived of its status as "Protecting Power" and POW's were reclassified as "Disarmed Enemy Forces. Bacque argued that this alleged mass murder was a direct result of the policies of the western Allies, who, with the Soviets, ruled as the Military Occupation Government over partitioned Germany from May 1945 until 1949. He laid the blame on Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower, saying Germans were kept on starvation rations even though there was no food shortage in Europe in 1945-1946.
[edit] Academic Analysis
Other Losses received initial support from some historians, including Richard Overy and Desmond Morton. Jonathon Osmond, writing in the Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, said: "Bacque...has published a corrective to the impression that the Western allies after the Second World War behaved in a civilised manner to the conquered Germans... The voices of those who suffered give harrowing accounts of cruelty and suffering"[1]Stephen Ambrose acknowledged that Bacque had made a "major historical discovery", in the sense that very little attention had hitherto been paid to the treatment of German POWs in Allied hands.
However, most professional historians reject Bacque's central claims. Sir John Keegan has referred to Bacque's argument as "entirely bogus" and "a crackpot assertion".[2] Richard J. Evans, a scholar of the Third Reich, has referred to Bacque's book as having been "exposed as a tissue of errors and falsehoods (with) as little historical credibility as Holocaust denial." He goes on to state that, "Bacque's work has been shown to rest on the manipulation of statistics."[3] Professor Gabriel Kolko - a frequent critic of American foreign policy - has written that Bacque's use of statistics is "completely fallacious."[4] Edward S. Herman, another radical critic of American foreign policy and a frequent collaborator with Noam Chomsky, has written that Bacque's claims are "a huge exaggeration based on a misreading and concocting of evidence."[5].
Academic reviewers question three major aspects of Bacque's work: his claims that there was no post-war food shortage; Bacque's estimate of the number of German deaths; and the allegation that Eisenhower was deliberately vindictive. Bacque's critics note many of the German soldiers were sick and wounded at the time of their surrender, and say his work does not place the plight of the German prisoners within the context of the grim situation in Western Europe in 1945 and 1946. Writing in the Canadian Historical Review, David Stafford called the book "a classic example of a worthwhile investigation marred by polemic and overstatement."[6] R.J. Rummell, a scholar of 20th-century atrocities, has written that "Basque misread, misinterpreted, or ignored the relevant documents and that his mortality statistics are simply impossible."[7]. More recently, writing in the Encyclopedia of Prisoners of War and Internment, S.P. MacKenzie states, "That German prisoners were treated very badly in the months immediately after the war...is beyond dispute. All in all, however, Bacque's thesis and mortality figures cannot be taken as accurate".[8]
Leftist historians see Bacque's work as potentially useful to Holocaust deniers and neo-Nazis who try to equate Allied actions with the atrocities perpetrated by Nazi Germany. Professor Gabriel Kolko - a well known radical historian and critic of American foreign policy - has written that Bacque's use of statistics is "completely fallacious."[9] Edward S. Herman, another radical critic of American foreign policy and a frequent collaborator with Noam Chomsky, has written that Bacque's claims are "a huge exaggeration based on a misreading and concocting of evidence."[10].
A book-length disputation of Bacque's claims, entitled Eisenhower and the German POWs, appeared in 1992, featuring essays by British, American, and German historians. Despite the criticisms of Bacque's methodology, Stephen Ambrose and Brian Loring Villa, the authors of the chapter on German POW deaths, conceded the Allies were motivated in their treatment of captured Germans by disgust and revenge for German attrocities.[11] They did, however, argue Bacque's casualty figures are ar too high, and that policy was set by Allied politicians, not by Eisenhower.[12]
Even so, Bacque's historical works are credited with spurring further research into the important question of the treatment of German POWs and German civilians at the end of the Second World War, a topic about which English-speaking historians have shown comparatively little interest. As Stephen Ambrose conceded, "we as Americans can't duck the fact that terrible things happened. And they happened at the end of a war we fought for decency and freedom, and they are not excusable."[13]
[edit] Crimes and Mercies
In a subsequent book, Crimes And Mercies (2003), Bacque claimed that western Allied policies led to the premature deaths of millions of German civilians by starvation after World War Two. Crimes and Mercies met with far less hostility from historians, who acknowledge the deaths of hundreds of thousands of German soldiers and civilians held in Soviet captivity,[citation needed] and possibly up to two million civilians who died in the mass expulsions of Germans from East Prussia, Pomerania, western Poland, Silesia, the Sudetenland and Romania.[citation needed]
[edit] Books by James Bacque
Other Losses
Crimes and Mercies
Dear Enemy
Just Raoul
The Queen Comes To Minnicog
The Lonely Ones
A Man of Talent
[edit] Notes
- ^ Other Losses: An Investigation into the Mass Deaths of German Prisoners of War After World War II., Review author[s]: Jonathan Osmond International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) © 1991 Royal Institute of International Affairs
- ^ John Keegan,The Battle for History (Toronto: Vintage Books, 1995),10.
- ^ http://www.hdot.org/evidence/evans003.asp
- ^ cited by Stafford, op.cit.
- ^ Z-MagazineJanuary 1996. Available on-line at: http://www.zmag.org/ZMag/articles/jan96letters.htm
- ^ Canadian Historical Review [Canada] 1990 71(Sep): 408-409.
- ^ Power Kills Chapter 13. Available on line at: http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP13.HTM
- ^ S.P. Mackenzie in J. Vance, ed. The Encyclopedia of Internment and Prisoners of War, 294
- ^ cited by Stafford, op.cit.
- ^ Z-MagazineJanuary 1996. Available on-line at: http://www.zmag.org/ZMag/articles/jan96letters.htm
- ^ Eisenhower and the German POWs: Facts against Falsehood., Review author[s]: Joan Beaumont The Journal of Modern History © 1995 The University of Chicago Press.
- ^ Eisenhower and the German POWs: Facts Against Falsehood., Review author[s]: Earl F. Ziemke The Journal of American History © 1994 Organization of American Historians
- ^ Ike's Revenge? Time Magazine, Monday, Oct. 2, 1989
[edit] Bibliography
- Other Losses Prima Publishing; ISBN 1-55168-191-9
- Crimes and Mercies, Little Brown & Company; ISBN 0-7515-2277-5
[edit] See also
[edit] Further reading
"Other Losses" in The Encyclopedia of Prisoners of War and Internment, 2nd Edition. Jonathan Vance, ed. (Millerton, NY: Grey House Publishing, 2006), 294-295.
Gunter Bischof and Stephen Ambrose, eds., Eisenhower and the German POWs (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1992).
S.P. MacKenzie, "Essay and Reflection: On the Other Losses Debate," International History Review 14 (1992): 661-680.
[edit] External links
- James Bacque official site
- Did the Allies Starve Millions of Germans? -- This James Bacque article seems to be the main source for the genocide accusation
- New York Times Book Review of Other Losses by historian Stephen Ambrose.
- Letters to the Editor of New Tork Times in response to Ambrose's review.
- A Lengthy Critique of "Other Losses"
- Bacque and US Army historian Fisher's reply to Ambrose
- Bacque's rebuttal: http://www.serendipity.li/hr/bacque01.htm
- Bacque On Wikipedia: http://serendipity.li/hr/bacque_on_wikipedia.htm
- Várdy, Steven Béla and Tooly, T. Hunt: Ethnic Cleansing in Twentieth-Century Europe Available as MS Word for Windows file (3.4 MB) Subsection: Richard Dominic Wiggers, The United States and the Refusal to Feed German Civilians after World War II pp. 274 - 288