User talk:Jalnet2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello.

Hi! :)

[edit] UMaine pic

Thanks for that breathtaking UMaine pic. Got any more?  :)

I'm just getting into this, and I'm amazed how quickly this stuff gets seen! I have tons more, since I'm up here about 95% of my time. Any requests? - NightThree 02:02, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Race

Jalnet, I left a message for you on the Talk page, and I'd appreciate it you would address it, as it might go some way to working out what the main issues are. It makes no sense to continually revert as the consenus is against your position. SlimVirgin 01:50, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

You have just violated 3RR. Please do not keep reverting. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 01:59, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours for a violation of the three revert rule on Race. You can edit again in 24 hours -- Chris 73 Talk 02:45, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
Regarding your email, please see Wikipedia:Three-revert rule for full details. In summary: Don't revert any page more than three times within a period of 24 hours. (This doesn't apply to self-reverts or correcting simple vandalism.) Your revert was not reverting simple vandalism, you also got warned, yet you reverted it again. Hence a block is proper. In the future, please pay attention to the 3RR rule. Please also note, that timed reverts (i.e. 4 reverts in 24 hours and 1 minute) may also get you blocked. -- Chris 73 Talk 03:06, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Since you brought the 3RR violation by Slrubenstein to my attention, I assumed you were familiar with the rule. You are not to revert an ARTICLE more than 3 times in a 24 hour period... it does not matter if you are reverting 3 different things. You BOTH violated the 3RR and therefore you were both punished equally (as is the appropriate sanction as stated in the 3RR). If you have reasonable suggestions, feel free to raise them on the talk page and seek consensus. I will not investigate the history of this dispute. I have no interest in this dispute beyond assuring that it doesn't continue in the form of reverts. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:06, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)