Talk:Jagadguru Kripalu Ji Maharaj
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] PoV tag
This article is full of promotional language not suitable for an encyclopaedia. At least some of this seems to have been taken from http://www.jkp.org/jagadguru_kripaluji/a_brief_life_history.htm . The article does not describe what denomination this person belongs to, and a reader has to go to the external link to see that he is a follower of some kind in the Gaudiya tradition. Imc 22:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
In case you find the content promotional, then you are free to edit it to make it suitable for an encyclopedia. I would like to point out that He doesnt belong to the Gaudiya tradition, to the best of my knowledge. He hasnt rejected any philosphy and preaches devotion to Radha Krishna.
Kindly "clean up" the article yourself or atleast give me some indication of what is it that you find irksome so that I can do the same and remove the PoV tag.
I merged some of the information from the article "Jagadguru Kripaluji Maharaj", and tried to clean up some of the wording. The article still needs a detached point of view to make it truly encyclopedic. --Janus657 21:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edited Page
I have tried my best to write and edit the page in order to meet with the criterion. I think now it can be considered as a neutral article. Although gradually I shall try to bring out some other necessary changes.
Thanks,
Kindly, mail me for any issue: at nitin.beri@gmail.com.
--Nitin Beri
[edit] Article made well-read
I have made an attempt here, to raise the level of this article fit to be literary and well-read as an encyclopedia should be.
Like in the sentence, "The questions were for well-being of public who is perplexed by innumerable and contradictory knowldge of Hindu scriptures, thus not getting the proper path"; the preposition "is" seemed to me as unfit grammatically while refering to the word "public" which is a plural. Besides, the use of the article "the" before the word "well- being" is missing.
The corrected sentence stands as, "The questions were raised for the well-being of the lay-person amongst the average public, who is perplexed by the seemingly innumerable and contradictory knowldge of Hindu scriptures, thus not getting the proper path".
The use of the word "seemingly" seemed necessary in the above sentence because, if in actual reality the knowledge made available in the scriptures is contradictory, then it would be conceptually absurd to go ahead and reconcile these theories which are so concretely contradictory. A reconciliation, which the article clearly points out in the last paragraph under the heading "Philosophy and Teachings".
Many such assumably minuate, yet clearly major grammatical errors have been removed from this article.
