User talk:Jacko29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jacko clothing line was invented in 2006 so that people can understand the art of communicating and connecting with others through different means. the clothing line has all its items in prints and thus improves the psychologucal aspect in each individual. Jacko, though a name largely used in a derogatory manner, the website/clothing line portrays its name in an absolutely honest, paceful, truthful and realistic manner. Derived from superstar Michael Jackson's name, Jacko becomes a positive clothing line and arrangement to look to. Thus printing in, literary humours on mugs, t shirts for ladies, men, kids and babies. Jacko therefore can be seen as a positive and uplifting name. Every critic has a right to say what they like, just as every household that has to get the critic hit has a right to enhance the qualities in the criticism it gets slapped in. Positivity and negativity all have the good and bad effects. It is thus a challenge to use JACKO as a beautiful clothing line and yet in a most positive way. For example, a critic would say that I want to make money out of my singing career [if i was a singer] he/she has a point. You wouldn't go to work on a 9am to 5pm basis and not want to get your month's worth, would you? I produce good things, I expect a good pay just like any other critic who writes about me and sells my story! so, referring to super hero Michael Jackson as Jacko was initially a terrible mistake, but naturally, I take it upon myself to alleviate the embarrassment and minimize the damage could have caused by elaborating on it so that I can hopefully make the world a better place to live in.

Take another look at the man himself. Michael Jackson tells it as it is, maybe sometimes, he tries to be polite in very embarrassing situations. But, you cannot possible know Michael better than himself. A very simple analysis of Michael would be when he told the world that his kids are natural. What part of natural did people have difficulty with? Because he has natural and biological kids does not mean it came from Debbie Rowe[you must ask Debbie what her problem is]

Now, Debbie takes Michael to court because she is flattered with an ex-marriage certificate thinking that she would be able to use it to explot Michael. She may have had an IVF[that would simply mean that she is not the mother of Michael's kids] because we would like to stick to the fact that Michael has said it consistently that he did have his kids normally, sexually and of course, privately...there is nothing wrong with that. Whatever Debbie had, whether IVF or imaginary, she is obviosly only interested in causing trouble. Why? Simple....she is not Prince and Paris biological mother and so I feel that she is now being very, very rude to their real mother.

Now, she wants to steal Prince and Paris off Michael which is simply ridiculous because the kids do NOT want her at all. Who will? First, she's not their natural mother, then, she nicks Michael's money and gets a house, gets child allowances for kids absolutely not hers [there's no biological evidence that she carried Prince and Paris] She is only after riches from Michael and she is really, really asking for it.

Michael owes her nothing and the sooner she leaves Prince and Paris alone, the better it will be so that the world can be a healthier place for everyone to live in.

No mother should EVER collect BLOOD money for kids that do not leave with her. She is a thief and must be treated that way. She should remember that Prince and Paris need to remain with their father and she needs to STOP that intrusion. Leave MY children alone!

Nona

Contents

[edit] Jacko29

Please don't post POV essays on Wikipedia, they don't conform to the standards laid out for a good article. These standards can be read on the welcome pages. Please see WP:NPOV for details. Also Wikipedia is not a free webhost. The above content might well be better-suited to a personal webpage or blog rather than to WP. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  09:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

This has now being transfered to the appropriate web blog site.

[edit] Please don't vandalize Wikipedia

Replacing the content of Wikipedia:Featured articles with an essay goes well beyond inappropriate and into vandalism. Don't vandalize again or I will block you from editing. Consider contributing to the encyclopedia, or you will soon find yourself permanently blocked. Bishonen talk 09:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Raymone Bain

Please do not add commentary and your personal analysis of an article into Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's NPOV rules and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Funky Monkey 10:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Scientology

Please note that talkpages are for discussing how to improve the article, not for general essays or thoughts on the subject. See Wikipedia:Talk page. Below are some links to the major policies of this place that I hope will be of assistance to you. Bishonen | talk 11:01, 12 April 2006 (UTC).


Welcome!

Hello, Jacko29, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Bishonen | talk 11:01, 12 April 2006 (UTC).

Please note that this also applies to the 2 edits you have made to the Talk:Michael Jackson page. Talk pages are NOT the place for POV essays. Thanks Funky Monkey 11:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thriller (song)

Please do not add commentary and your personal analysis of an article into Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's NPOV rules and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Funky Monkey 20:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Block warning

Jacko29, this page is not your blog, it's for communicating with other users. It would be appreciated if you replied here to at least some of the comments you've been getting from experienced users. Please heed their advice. When I see people posting the same explanations to you over and over on this page, while you go on editing in the same wrongheaded way, it frankly doesn't look like you're trying to understand Wikipedia policy. Please click on the links that have been posted for you (blue words are links). Please stop posting POV essays. If nothing else works, I'm sorry to say we're going to have to get your attention by blocking you from editing. Bishonen | talk 20:51, 12 April 2006 (UTC).

I may have been editing into other territories when I should be replying to the comments made. The essays should have come under the replies as my opinions. Of course, I may not have realised that. I will rectify any styles of further writings accordingly.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../j/a/c/User_talk%7EJacko29_0b99.html"