User talk:J.L.Main
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page. If you would like to leave me a message i will be very happy, as i don't get many messages. I don't archive, i think it’s pointless, i just delete, so if we were having a discussion a year ago, it probably won't be here.
Contents |
[edit] In case you were wondering…
Concerning "the downfall of civilized culture and destroy wikipedia as we know it," this is not the reason. The reason can be found in these pages.
Nice to meet you! Jecowa 04:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- nice to meet you too. thanks for the links. now i know what i'm up against. basically a guy with a chip on his sholder:)J.L.Main 19:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Wiimote
I am for mentioning the term Wiimote in the Wii article. Sorry to confuse you. I'm guessing you were confused by those links that I listed above. Did I guess correctly? I'm sorry for not explaining what I was trying to say very well. I thought you might be interested in those links to see why some views wouldn't want to mention "Wiimote" in the Wii article. I didn't make the edits of the three links listed above. If you check those links again you will see that I did not make those edits. I only listed those links to show you the reasoning that the opposition uses for not including "Wiimote" in the article. I am for mentioning "Wiimote" in the Wii article. If you look at those links again you will see. I did not make those edits. Jecowa 08:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh if you mean this edit, I was only telling that guy that "Wiimote" isn't the official name for English-speaking countries. That doesn't mean that I think it shouldn't be included. Jecowa 15:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wildwood Christian School
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Wildwood Christian School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Wildwood Christian School. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Frexes 04:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Diabolik2345
(Please this is not vandalism i am Diabolik2345 and I dont know how to use Wikipidia except for editing stuff)
[edit] Re: History of video game consoles (eighth generation)
You'll never know unless you try. The article might be deleted for speculation, but the fact that there will be eighth gen consoles is not speculative. Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo fave already mentioned them a little. Of course Apple is secretive. The History of video game consoles (eighth generation) article has been deleted before, the last time being two months ago, but your version is much better than the previous ones. You have a lot of sources; that should make it less likely for people to AfD it. I would go ahead and try it. Jecowa 02:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC) P.S. TouchLight looks fine to me. I think the only thing else it needs is some categories to go in.
- I just noticed that PlayStation 4 was deleted six days ago and Xbox 720 was deleted thirteen days ago, but things that aren't worthy of their own article can often be grouped into a list that is acceptable. There is an article about bids that cities are considering making a few years down the road. Jecowa 03:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- "the 256-bit era is said to be including the playstation 3, xbox 2 and the next nintendo system dubbed nintendo 5 by gamers."
- jecowa, this is what the seventh gen article looked like when it first went up and it was allowed to stay. could you put it under the discussion for whether we should keep or remove the eighth gen. article?J.L.Main 11:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re: your deletion of the page on eighth gen. of video games
Thank you for such a reasoned and balanced response! I am glad that you have decided to continue with the project. Wikipedia needs hard-working editors like yourself! Regards, (aeropagitica) 05:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- i thought you would like to know that someone has re-created the article. i would recommend that it be marked for speedy deletion and then protected. please don't get me wrong, i do think the article should exist, but i don't think it should be re0created until something is known. J.L.Main 17:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Not according to the history on History of video game consoles (eighth generation). Can you give me a link to follow, please? (aeropagitica) 17:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 8th gen consoles
In reply to your argumentative message on my user page: I did read your article. I still consider it to be crystal balling, as apparently do many others who voted in the AfD. While I appreciate the work you put into this article, it is simply too early and too speculative at this point. By the way, you would probably be treated much better if you didn't have this penchant for arguing with those who disagree in the AfD debate. You're hurting your own cause. Realkyhick 01:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)