User talk:Itub
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Attention: I dislike fragmented discussions. If you leave a comment for me, I will most likely respond to it in here, in this same page, on my talk page, as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, always feel free to respond to it there, on your talk page. Remember we can use our watchlist to keep track and know when each other respond to each comment. But also feel free to send me an alert in here about a new message on your conversation side, as I might do it as well.
Thank you!
[edit] List of publications in chemistry
I have reverted your deletion on List of publications in chemistry and put that and the new addition you added up for debate on Talk:List of publications in chemistry. That is how things are done. See the guidelines we agreed some weeks ago on the talk page. I have recommended deletion of the external link and keeping your excellent new addition. Please keep contributing to this page. Regards, --Bduke 22:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
- No problem, thanks. Itub 22:39, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Henderson-Hasselbalch
Heyas, thanks for your limitations section to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation article. Most informative. -SocratesJedi | Talk 19:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yep, that was what I wanted to say about bismuth. Thanks =
Steve 04:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:La Cucaracha
I left a message at the La Cucaracha's talk page regarding the wording of the lyrics, and provided some sources at least I consider more important than the normal amateur site. It went unanswered for more than two weeks before I decided to take action and change the las phrase. You jumped to revert my edits, leaving no reference of the "las dos patitas de atras" version nor any message at the talk page. What's more, you claim that to be the "real" version, providing no sources. I feel like reverting back to my version, but will let you explain youractions and source your position. I'll past this also at the article's talk page. Mariano(t/c) 08:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Revert ñ
I had reverted it because I guess something had gone wrong with the coding and the page was deleted. I tried refreshing the ñ page and it kept givnig me an error that it no longer existed, so I reverted it and it came back. Sorry, not hard feeling to whatever change you had made. --Speakslowly 23:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Beta-methylamino L-alanine
Thanks for your message about this article. I've expanded it. Take a look and improve as necessary. Thanks, Scientizzle 22:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, that was a great expansion! Itub 23:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Note in History of Water (molecule)
Good idea:) Thanks! DMacks 20:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Visible spectrum
Thanks for your note. I'm not sure what the problem is either, but I'll put the word out for some help. Thanks again! -AED 21:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Circulene image
Thanks for point that out. (Was late at night :-( ) -- Gary van der Merwe (Talk) 07:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mexican Peso
Sorry about the flub on the conversion rate. I saw "currently" without any indication how current "current" was, and wanted to insert a date (and felt the need to validate that the rate hadn't changed since whenever "current" was). In case you're curious how I messed up: I got 9¢ (US) per peso backwards in my head. AdamRoach 18:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3-center-4e thing
Hi, I rewrote this article. I apologize if I seem to have lost some of your wording. You got this article off to a great start, and I could not resist. Feel free to revise what I put up. I will insert a figure soon. --Smokefoot 18:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've commented about the figure in the article's talk page. The only thing I miss is the mention of the equivalent representation in terms of resonance structures. I may add it later, but it sorely needs a figure too. :) Itub 20:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Molecular orbital theory
Hi, I notice that you are interested in molecular orbitals. Thus, for you to note, I have just started the molecular orbital theory article if you are interested in contributing. Thanks: --Sadi Carnot 23:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Could you have a look at the energy and the last two edits by Hallenrm?
Either I've completely lost my mind, or I'm dealing with an invariably insulting editor who has an advanced degree in chemistry, yet really doesn't understand key parts of the physics of the subject. So, I'm asking for some badly needed RfC on the chem section of this article. I'm leaving an identical message for user:smokefoot and everybody else with a chem degree I can think of. Gracias for the outside view. SBHarris 09:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Missing topics in chemistry
Thanks for the help with the missing topics page - Skysmith 10:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Non-covalent bonding
I'm puzzled by your removal of the merge tag from non-covalent bonding with the reason "non-covalent bonding is important in the field of supramolecular chemistry according to Lehn". I'm not questioning the importance of non-covalent bonding. What I'm questioning is whether the Wikipedia articles currently titled non-covalent bonding and intermolecular interaction actually deal with different topics. My opinion is that they don't, and therefore having two articles is redundant. I don't have a strong preference regarding the title of the resulting article, though. --Itub 12:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- While I appreciate your effort to organize, I have interest in supermolecular chemistry and although one could loosely merge these without to much difficulty, I reason that they should remain separate. Although I need to read more in this area, from what I understand so far Jean-Marie Lehn, the main founder of this field, who won the 1987 Nobel Prize for his work in SMC, defines “molecular chemistry”, as begun by Friedrich Wohler in 1828, as related to the making and breaking of covalent bonds. He contrasts this with the new field of “supramolecular chemistry” as related to the making and breaking of non-covalent bonds between supermolecules. Intermolecular forces, on the other had, is a more general term which may include the covalent bond if fashioned so. If you don’t believe me, look at this edit by User:V8rik, in which the intro definition of supramolecular chemistry is defined by the use of the term “noncovalent bonding. I hope this helps? --Sadi Carnot 00:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Halogen
Hi there! Just curious, why did you revert the numerous contributions made by James? —Signed, your friendly neighborhood MessedRocker. 11:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've detailed my reasons in Talk:Halogen. --Itub 12:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:James.Spudeman's edits.
Just thought i'd mirror what i posted to MessedRocker's page;
- I've just spoken to him (James) on the phone and he's informed me that his account has been re-infiltrated again by whoever keeps using his laptop, most likely his son. He's been away for 3 days on a trip, so it's unlikely any of the things that were added were from him directly, and he wanted to explain also that he's looked at his page and will change it when he gets back.
- He also informed me that his previous account, User:J.Spudeman was similarly infiltrated and the password and email changed so he was unable to recover it. Regardless, i'll see him on saturday morning and speak to him then, but i just wanted to give you the "heads up". Cheers, J O R D A N [talk ] 16:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for letting me know. --Itub 19:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Peeling eggs
From the left, of course!:-)dick 21:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)