Talk:Islam and animals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of the WikiProject Islam, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Islam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. |
||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
[edit] WP:RS
This page needs Reliable sources, not sources that are extremist.--Sefringle 03:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- What do you mean the sources are extremists? I've used quotes from the hadith to this article and analyse them from there. --Fantastic4boy 03:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Islamonline.net is extremist, because it has a clear bias to its work and is very one-sided. And some of your hadith quotes have not mentioned the exact hadith the interpritation came from. The ones that do do not mention a scholarly source to varify interpritation. And for future references when quoting the quran and hadith, use the quran-usc templete. It works like this:
- For verse 1:1, enter {{Quran-usc|1|1}}.
- This will allow people to just click on the link and view the verse as 1:1.
- For hadith quotes, to show Sahih Bukhari 8:73:68, enter {{Bukhari|8|73|68}}. --Sefringle 01:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- For verse 1:1, enter {{Quran-usc|1|1}}.
- Islamonline.net is extremist, because it has a clear bias to its work and is very one-sided. And some of your hadith quotes have not mentioned the exact hadith the interpritation came from. The ones that do do not mention a scholarly source to varify interpritation. And for future references when quoting the quran and hadith, use the quran-usc templete. It works like this:
I am not sure about this, but this article could possibly be merged with Muhammad's attitude towards animals.128.100.53.151 20:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Those two article basically repeat themselves. Al-Bargit 17:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support Less POV title and same topic--Sefringle 00:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Support: At the least there should be RS for the introduction. --Matt57 19:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose and comment I would very much like it if Muhammad's attitude towards animals were merged into this article, not the other way around.--Ķĩřβȳ♥♥♥ŤįɱéØ 02:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Caging animals
What is the authority to say that Islam forbids caging animals? Please address with special consideration to the caging of birds for their cultivation and the caging of hens to obtain their eggs. I would agree that caging affronts the Buddha.DavidYork71 06:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
