User talk:Invitatious
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
List of archives:
- /Archive 1 (to July 6, 2006)
Please sign your comments with four tildes ( ~~~~ ). Any vandalism will be reverted on sight. Thanks!
Add comments below this line:
Contents |
[edit] CVU svg
Good job fixing Image:CVU2.svg — I didn't realize text could be converted to a path. Thanks. ~ Booya Bazooka 18:45, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Invitatious! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael / 17:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 17:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Invitatious! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael / 17:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 17:27, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: User:Invitatious/scripts/highlightsig
Thanks for telling me! It looks quite useful :)
Sadly, however, I do not have any time to do any coding until my wikibreak ends on August 12. Sorry about that.
I saw, however, that you were looking into modifiying how dates appear. I do have a script that modifies date timezones; you may find it helpful to take some code from there. Here is the link: User:Where/commentLocalize. Note that the script uses regular expressions.
Happy editing! -- Where 20:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Smile
Hi: I tagged the article "Smile", and I stand corrected. My apologies for giving you unnecessary work; how would I tell from the article that it is a mirror? Looking at the calibre of the Author's command of the English language on his talk page it is obvious that he could not have written the article. Not criticising, asking for education.--Anthony.bradbury 15:55, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Coolcaesar and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration
I have noted you as an involved party and/or commenter upon the behavior of user:Coolcaesar in the filed Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. I greatly wish that you would comment on his behavior, and add references, links, etc. supporting your particular view to the current evidence already there. Please also explain his attitude/comments/witnessed behavior with detail about your experience in dealing with him. I do greatly appreciate it, and note that your reputation is protected upon comments at arbitration, and cannot be used against you. Thanks for your Time. --Mr.Executive 08:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cross-namespace redirects
Hey, I just thought I'd stop in to say that I've found User:Invitatious/cnr very useful, and I was wondering when the next edition would be published. Thanks a lot, Cyde Weys 13:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bonzi buddy
I wanted to first thank you for noticing that Bonzi Buddy needs a complete rewrite, but also to encourage you to feel comfortable doing a lot more than that. When we have an article of that sort, the most sensible thing to do, I think, is to radically stub it and insist firmly FIRMLY on sources. If you do that, and anyone complains, I will gladly back you up on it.
Anyway, thanks for noticing the article was bad.--Jimbo Wales 11:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)