Talk:Inverted nipple

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Contents 1 Sexual 2 Language 3 pictures 4 Clarification? 5 insult

[edit] Sexual

Why is this in the sexual anatomy category? --chad 08:09, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Language

The language used in this article is rather juevanile. I think it calls for a cleanup. Tinman8443 20:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] pictures

there should be pictures

another vote for pictures —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 159.105.80.92 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I think pictures would be appropriate considering the rare nature of this deformity. Tinman8443 20:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Clarification?

I just tried to organize the article a bit. I ended up rephrasing a few things for clarity's sake, but a few of the paragraphs just didn't make sense to me. In particular, the breastfeeding paragraph beginnging "Another treatment is to shape the nipple", while I sort of understood the concept, just seems garbled. If anyone knows what this user was trying to say and could clarify, that would be wonderful. Also, I don't know much about piercing, and the precaution about healing was somewhat confusing.--Joanna 04:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] insult

this is very insulting, i have it. your using a very strong word. your acting like its an awful deformity,"what monsters", you say. in fact no one has ever said anything about it. its just like saying "people with blonde hair are stupid". T strong language in this article should be removed. it is hardly noticable. if you saw a guy with an ugly face you would say,"what an ugly face" not "what ugly nipples". if you saw a handsome guy you would say "that guy is handsome" not that guy has bad nipples". this is highly juvenile.216.49.242.45 02:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)ip address

We strive for a NPOV here, and if you feel that this article is biased, please either correct it yourself or be more specific about where exactly the "strong language" lies. -Joanna 04:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)