Talk:Into the Black
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This Firefly-related article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefly, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the TV series Firefly, its spin-offs, and all things related to the Firefly 'verse. You can help! Visit the project page or discuss an article at the project talk-page. |
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.) |
|
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-08-18. The result of the discussion was delete. |
[edit] AfD
FYI, this was deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Black in August 2006. --Fang Aili talk 16:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, but now it has had significant independant coverage and appearances at conferences and shows, as well as mentions from Joss Whedon and Nathan Fillion. The coverage is growing, and therefore so is its notability. -- Ubergenius 20:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- The situation has changed since the last proposal for deletion. The group has gained much media attention, including a showing at V-con and mentions in various news articles. The standards for previous deletion no longer apply, as the reasonings was lack of notability, which has changed. -- Ubergenius 19:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely. But none of that dictates the removal of the notice that, once upon a time, the article didn't meet muster. This is an important notice, and as such I've re-implemented it. Don't remove it in belief that it's an attack against the page or your project, but simply an informative notice to other editors. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 22:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh my goodness, I'm such a fool. I misread that notice the first time, I thought it was the designation of deletion notice, the one where if it remains for 5 days, the article is removed. I am sorry for my foolishness. -- Ubergenius 16:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Absolutely. But none of that dictates the removal of the notice that, once upon a time, the article didn't meet muster. This is an important notice, and as such I've re-implemented it. Don't remove it in belief that it's an attack against the page or your project, but simply an informative notice to other editors. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 22:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- The situation has changed since the last proposal for deletion. The group has gained much media attention, including a showing at V-con and mentions in various news articles. The standards for previous deletion no longer apply, as the reasonings was lack of notability, which has changed. -- Ubergenius 19:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
