From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
|
| Editing Guidelines |
|
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
[edit] Discussion of incompleted text
can the synopsis use the word 'incomplete' any more? maybe as a verb? i have a hard time believing this is uncounsciously done as brain damaged writing. bad writing , yes. as it seems someone is unable of confirming the presence of an idee-fixe or liet motif without constantly using repetition.
- Wow, there are a ridiculous number of 'incomplete's there. I am surprised that the author didn't try to use the verb incompleted, not that it exists but it seems it would fit in nicely with the number of incompletes here. ~ SW 23:39, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- This film had to have one of the best beginings ever when colin farrells chating up the girl in the shop and bam he totally changes in a secondBouse23 11:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The synopsis is dire
The synopsis reads like an ad. It's barely a spoiler at all, it doesn't say how anything ends, just that all endings are either funny, surprising, or unexpected - but nothing about how, why, or what the endings of each thread are. Gronky 23:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
