Internal passport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An internal passport is an identification document issued in some countries. Its main purpose is similar to that of an identity card, however in some countries internal passports had other restrictive functions. Examples of countries that used or use internal passports include Russia (modern as well as Imperial Russia), the former Soviet Union and, currently, North Korea.

Pages of internal passport, issued 1910 in Imperial Russia
Pages of internal passport, issued 1910 in Imperial Russia

Contents

[edit] Soviet Union

Internal passports were used in the Soviet Union for identification of persons for various purposes. In particular, passports were used to control and monitor the place of residence by means of propiska. Officially, propiska was introduced for statistical reasons: since in the planned economy of the Soviet Union the distribution of goods and services was centralized, the overall distribution of population was to be monitored. For example, a valid propiska was necessary to receive higher education or medical treatment.

All residents were required by law to record their address on the document, and to report any changes to a local office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (e.g., by the age of 45, a person has to have three photographs of themself in the passport due to the effects of aging, taken at the age of 16 (when it is issued), 25 and 45). In Ukraine, these laws were struck down by its Constitutional Court in 2001 on the grounds of unconstitutionality. In Russia, similar cases have so far failed, and the system remains in place, although largely reduced. The system of internal passport registration remains strongly in place in Moscow, which uses the recent terrorist attacks on that city as a justification for their continued use.

[edit] People's Republic of China

The People's Republic of China (PRC) maintains a system of residency registration in mainland China known as hukou, by which government permission is needed to formally change one's place of residency. This system effectively controlled internal migration before the 1980s, but market reforms have caused the system to collapse as a means of migration control and an estimated 150 to 200 million people are part of the "blind flow" and have unofficially migrated, generally from poor, rural areas to wealthy, urban ones. Unofficial residents are, however, often denied official services such as education and medical care and are sometimes topics of both social and official discrimination. (A similar system of household registration is maintained in the Republic of China (Taiwan), but it does not restrict travel like in mainland China.)

Hong Kong and Macao residents need Home Return Permits, issued by the PRC government through the Guangdong Public Security Bureau, to enter mainland China. The system was in place when the Hong Kong and Macao were under British and Portuguese rule, and was retained after their sovereignty were transferred to the PRC in 1997 and 1999 respectively under the One country, two systems policy. The PRC government often denies applications of permits from democracy advocates in Hong Kong. In the other way round, a travelling permit, issued by the PRC government, is required for residents of mainland China to visit Hong Kong or Macao.

[edit] Other

In South Africa, the pass laws (notably the Pass Laws Act 1952 which applied until 1986) were used to enforce apartheid. The law stipulated where, when, and for how long a person could remain, and made it compulsory for all black South Africans over the age of 15 to carry a "pass book" at all times.

Some civil liberties campaigners in western democracies have likened some planned counter-terrorism measures as an akin to the introduction of an internal passport. For instance, Tim Lott, writing in London's Evening Standard in December 2002 said that the proposed British identity card was a possible pre-cursor to an "internal passport".

Similar ardent privacy advocates in the United States, such as Bill Scannell of dontspyon.us, called the CAPPS II plan to color-code air passengers by their potential terrorist status as a prelude to an internal passport. The phrase has not however gained wide currency with the respect to these measures.

[edit] See also

[edit] References

In other languages