Image talk:Intonation (linguistics).ogg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Spoken WikipediaWikiProject Spoken Wikipedia

This page is dedicated to reviewing the quality of Image:Intonation (linguistics).ogg.
Please leave your thoughts in one of the sections below. Thanks for your feedback!


Contents

[edit] Technical Quality

This section is for comments that pertain to recording technique, hardware, and software. For example: amount of background noise, breathing into the microphone, dynamic range, bitrate.


[edit] Clarity

This section is for comments that pertain to how clearly the article is read. For example: How well the reader enunciates, pacing, how easy it is to understand.
  1. Low clarity. Very difficult to understand. Words blend together, improper word emphasis disrupts sentence flow.
  2. Moderate clarity. Problems do not hinder basic comprehension.
  3. High clarity. User enunciates clearly and most of the article can be understood without difficulty


[edit] Pronunciation and Accuracy

This section is for comments that pertain to how well the reader reads the aticle, including mis-steps and non-accent related mis-pronunciation of words (for example, mispronouncing a well-known name).


[edit] Other Comments