Template talk:Infobox kdrama

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	WikiProject Korea invites you to join in improving Wikipedia articles related to Korea. Community: Discussion - Notice board Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventions Navigation: Key topics - Browse - Portal
	This article: Tool quality, Medium priority.
Korea-related tasks: edit refresh Collaboration of the month Create articles Cleanup articles Assess articles Add Korean text Maintain unstable articles Discuss articles for deletion Improve A-class articles Improve B-class articles Improve Start-class articles Improve D-class articles Improve Stub-class articles Improve top priority articles Improve high priority articles Improve medium priority articles Improve low priority articles Improve very low priority articles Articles to work on: Goguryeo, achieve consensus and neutral point of view. 2007-03-16 Comfort women, achieve stability. 2007-3-29 Tteok, expand. 2007-03-16 Jeongol (전골), create. 2007-03-16 Science and technology in Korea, create. 2007-03-17 Naval history of Korea, create. 2007-03-17 Revised Romanization of Korean, include reasonably complete rule set. 2007-03-29

This is a very unusual setup. Is there any reason for having the template in three parts? -- Visviva 08:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The original idea behind the three or four part method is conveniency. It allows you to make several combinations: header-infobox-namebox-footer, header-namebox-footer or header-infobox-footer, which ever you're looking for. For example, Bad Housewife uses header-infobox-footer and Emperor of the Sea header-infobox-namebox-footer. --さくら木 10:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

OK, that makes sense. Thanks for explaining. I think the same effect could be achieved with ParserFunctions, but that might be messier in the end. -- Visviva 11:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)