Template talk:Infobox character
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Explanation of parameters
Parameter | Explanation |
---|---|
Colour | (EG: #FFFFFF, Default: #DEDEE2) |
Name | Name of character |
Image | Image of the character |
Caption | Image caption |
First | First appearance of the character |
Last | Last appearance of the character |
Cause | Reason for leaving |
Nickname | Any nicknames |
Alias | Any aliases |
Species | Species of character (if not obvious) |
Gender | Gender of character (if not obvious) |
Age | Age of character |
Born | Year of birth |
Death | Year of death |
Occupation | Occupation of the character |
Title | Any titles held by character |
Call Sign | Any call signs used by the character (e.g. in radio communications) |
Family | Family members not integral to the story |
Spouse | Spouse's name |
Children | Any children |
Relatives | Relatives integral to the story |
Episode | Number of episode character has appeared in |
Portrayer | Actor who played the character |
Creator | Character's creator |
[edit] Colours
i wonder if any wikipedians know anything about decent color choices
all these infoboxes have such ugly colors. 08:30, 10 July 2006 71.235.238.180 (Talk)
- I have listend to your comments and believed optional colouring would be a good idea. It has been implemented (IE: | colour = #FFFFFF) Matthew Fenton (contribs) 17:48, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- In some other infoboxes, there are particular color-codes with specific meanings; is there any meaning to the colors used in this one, or is it just an aesthetic choice?
- Yep I think it's purely aesthetic.--NeilEvans 23:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- In some other infoboxes, there are particular color-codes with specific meanings; is there any meaning to the colors used in this one, or is it just an aesthetic choice?
[edit] Family
Is there some reason that both the "Family" and "Relatives" fields are necessary? They seem wholly redundant to me. Shannernanner 14:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'd guess family = immediate family, and relatives ie. a cousin that is perhaps notable in the show. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- If it were clarified in "Usage" as such, that might perhaps make sense; currently, "Relatives" is listed as "Relatives who are important to the story," and "Family" as "Other family members not included below." Shannernanner 18:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Statistics?
The heading "Statistics" doesn't make much sense since there is little to do with statistics. How about renaming to "Information"? Cburnett 22:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yea. Or perhaps characteristics? thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Information is probably better as that is what the sections is, information about the character.--NeilEvans 23:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
I went ahead with "Information" because things like creator, portrayal, etc. aren't characteristics (species, gender, etc. would be though). I don't care if it gets changed again, it's just that there's 3-0 that statistics is not the word of choice. :) Cburnett 01:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cause
I don't really like the Cause section of the infobox. It isn't always too clear what to put into this section. What do you think about changing this to Current Status like the 24 character infobox Template:24 character CaptainGetts 22:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't like the field, nor do I like the idea of "current status", seems to ambiguous to me and would probably be written prose. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:55, 1 March 2007 (UTC)