Talk:Infornography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the doctor's mess.
Stub	rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

This could be expanded more and I've even provided some references you can use if you get to this before I do. Wired also has a section called Infoporn. I wouldn't object to a rename to Information addiction though, even given that I am fond of the term from Lain. Kotepho 22:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

I so-did-it. Revert if problematical. Hpuppet - «Talk» 14:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Much of the article's text (starting from September 13th, 2005) was plagiarized (see the Internet Archive for verification: http://web.archive.org/web/20010405093618/http://www.cjas.org/~leng/lain.htm ), so I kept the basic info, quoted it properly, and linked back to the original source.

[edit] Wikipediholic??

there is a see also Wikipediholic but no such subject exists, what then is the point of a see also? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.24.195.253 (talk • contribs).

[edit] Redirect

People searching for Wikipediholic are most likely looking for WP:HOLIC itself without realising that it is in the Wikipedia namespace, requiring a prefix. So why does Wikipediholic redirect here? Littleghostboo[ talk ] 01:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)