Informal fallacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Philosophical logic, an informal fallacy is a pattern of reasoning which is false due to the falsity of one or more of its premises. It is in contrast to a logical or formal fallacy, which is false due to a fundamental flaw in its argument structure.

[edit] Types of informal fallacies

Begging the question is one of the most common types of informal fallacies, where there is a co-premise which would be the subject of an inference objection, which in effect is the question that has been "begged".

[edit] See also

Informal fallacies
v  d  e
Special pleading | Red herring | Gambler's fallacy and its inverse
Fallacy of distribution (Composition | Division) | Begging the question | Many questions
Correlative-based fallacies:
False dilemma (Perfect solution) | Denying the correlative | Suppressed correlative
Deductive fallacies:
Accident | Converse accident
Inductive fallacies:
Hasty generalization | Overwhelming exception | Biased sample
False analogy | Misleading vividness | Conjunction fallacy
Vagueness:
False precision | Slippery slope
Ambiguity:
Amphibology | Continuum fallacy | False attribution (Contextomy | Quoting out of context)
Equivocation (Loki's Wager | No true Scotsman)
Questionable cause:
Correlation does not imply causation | Post hoc | Regression fallacy
Texas sharpshooter | Circular cause and consequence | Wrong direction | Single cause
Other types of fallacy