User talk:Inetpup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Bay Area Rapid Transit 2 United Airlines external links 3 Please use the Edit Summary 4 Please do not change my user page 5 Japanese kana 6 Personal commentary in Bay Area Rapid Transit 7 My userpage 8 Deletion 9 Empty Page 10 Fortress hub 11 FYI 12 My user page 13 Intercontinental 14 HP code

[edit] Bay Area Rapid Transit

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Bay Area Rapid Transit, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. ²¹⁰physicq (c) 00:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] United Airlines external links

An article which consists of nothing but links to other sites is specifically forbidden by WP:NOT. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please use the Edit Summary

I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! --Matt 02:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not change my user page

I maintain my user page - please refrain from updating it. Thanks! --Matt 04:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Japanese kana

Thanks for the info about the characters. I used the 'tsi' because the Ze in my name is pronounced zee as in zebra. Is there a way to do that? - Zepheus <ツィフィアス> 04:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Thread continued on your discussion page--Inetpup 18:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Personal commentary in Bay Area Rapid Transit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Bay Area Rapid Transit, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! —Dgies^t c 08:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My userpage

I don't mind the edits you made to my page (I do have a minor interest in those topics) (oh, and thank you), but it would have been nice to ask me first before adding. Otherwise, no harm done. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 03:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion

A tag has been placed on Red stapler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Bookworm857158367 06:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Empty Page

[edit] Fortress hub

A tag has been placed on Fortress hub, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 07:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FYI

FYI: transatlantic and transpacific aren't capitalized or CamelCase. Cheers --Matt 01:32, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

diff - not referring to your IP ;) --Matt 06:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My user page

Please stop editing my user page. While you may have been well-intentioned, I prefer to keep my layout, including linking, content, etc. —²¹⁰physicq (c) 01:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Intercontinental

Intercontinental means: Taking place between two or more continents. --Matt 16:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

• Sorry, got confused with 'transcontinental'. Good eye, Matty! --Inetpup 04:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't know who "Matty" is. --Matt 04:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

• It's the nickname I picked for you. Aren't you glad or impressed? --Inetpup 04:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Aww, how cute! --Matt 04:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] HP code

I reverted out this trivia section since that is not an encyclopedic heading. If the information is worth keeping, it should be included in that main article text. If that tidbit is true, the IATA code lists should be updated to include that previous use. In any case, if this is added back to the HP article, it should include a reference, otherwise it will be tagged needing one. Vegaswikian 02:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

• You really need to read up on wikipedia. I'd suggest sections like Wikipedia:Trivia, WP:RS, WP:AIRLINES. Vegaswikian 05:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Perhaps you are correct that I should read up on aspects of Wikipedia in general, but perhaps I don't need to be educated regarding 'Trivia' as it relates to airlines. Authors of all the other airliner articles have spoken. And they have overwhelmingly and have collectively decided to insert a Trivia section for all other airliner articles. I can't say that there's something special about US Airways and America West that should allow them to be non-standard, such that only they exclude a trivia section, when all their peers have one. Thanks.--Inetpup 05:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
    • You are saying that this is an accepted standard despite the fact that that section is not considered as being needed by the WP:AIRLINES project? If the material is in fact encyclopedic, it should be included in the article text. Most of this material is historical and should be there. Vegaswikian 05:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)