From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. |
|
|
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
|
This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
|
Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
This article needs an infobox to be added. |
I am told the general academic consensus about the Comentarios Reales by G de la Vega nowadays is that it bears more importance as a historical document and literary achievement than as a reliable source for historic information.
I found numerous inuendo to discredit "El Inca"'s integrity, but no facts whatsoever to back it up. I do not speak Spanish and rely on translations.
Question: is there anything written in the Comentarios Reales which can be construed as a fiction for a fact.