Talk:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Maintenance An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
This article is supported by the Peru WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia.
Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article needs an infobox to be added.


I am told the general academic consensus about the Comentarios Reales by G de la Vega nowadays is that it bears more importance as a historical document and literary achievement than as a reliable source for historic information.

I found numerous inuendo to discredit "El Inca"'s integrity, but no facts whatsoever to back it up. I do not speak Spanish and rely on translations.

Question: is there anything written in the Comentarios Reales which can be construed as a fiction for a fact.