Talk:Imperial Presidency
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article confused me, because a section called "Criticisms" should be criticisms of the theory of the Imperial Presidency, not the arguements of the theory itself. So I changed the main section title to "Arguements" and added a section for the criticisms of the theory, called "Criticisms." Erikmartin 20:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I'm surprised that this article a) hasn't been updated to include something about Bush and b) doesn't reference Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.'s "Imperial Presidency" (ISBN: 0735100470), which seems to be the classic treatise ont the subject. Unfortunately I'm not competent to do either. Mike Linksvayer 22:58, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Added Schlesinger book ref following example elsewhere. Mike Linksvayer 23:11, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I didn't really understand any of this article at all. It doesn't explain "Imperial Presidency" in a clear manner whatsoever. GravyFish 03:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Weaseling
This article seems to talk a lot about allegations about an Imperial Presidency. A rewording of the many of the examples will probably make this a more factual entry. --Janus657 20:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)