Talk:IMeta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Business and Economics Portal This article is within the scope of Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub	rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

Imeta was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS TO DELETE

• Advert for a minor company. Delete. jni 14:55, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• I suppose it could be rewritten if it weren't completely adspeak. Delete. -- Hadal 15:35, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• If you are going to abuse the Wikipedia for shameless and blatant advertising then at least make it a good advert for Christ's sake. These is no useful content in this article whatsoever. At consists almost intirely of vague and meaningless marketing clichees. When was the company founded? by whom? who owns it? how many employees? what kind of software do you make? The user who wrote this crap should be banned from Wikipedia for life. Delete Klafubra 16:00, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Send to clean up: First, it's copyvio. Second, it's junk. Third, though, iMeta (n.b. miniscule) is a major corporation that has been involved in rather a lot. They're one of the bigger players. I think, were this article not such utter bull manure, we'd have voted "keep"; therefore, although I lack much confidence in the process, I recommend copying the VfD discussion into the article's Talk page and sending it to Clean Up with a request to be sent back to VfD if not remedied in a month. Geogre 18:25, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Not an ad. Useful information. No reason to delete. anthony 警告 18:30, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Misnamed and a substub. --Farside 19:00, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• I don't see any information here. Concur with Geogre -- will take his word that it's notable. --Improv 20:11, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and send to cleanup. Factitious 01:43, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)
• Article does not establish notability. Delete. RickK 20:34, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)
• Death to the software company substubs. JFW | T@lk 04:20, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep but cleanup (if its a copyvio, delete, rewrite) —siroχo 20:48, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless it clearly establishes notability. ~2400 hits (and of those, some refer to other things[1][2]) and an Alexa rank of 3,789,203 doesn't say notable to me. Niteowlneils 22:19, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • What alexa rank would you require? anthony 警告 18:34, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete advertisement. -- Cyrius|✎ 06:30, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Encyclopedic, relevant, factually accurate, verifiable. --[[User:OldakQuill|Oldak Quill]] 00:53, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

End archived discussion -- Graham ☺ | Talk 00:35, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August, 2005. The result of the vote was still keep, still no consensus. An archived record of this vote can be found here.