Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2007 April 4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] April 4
[edit] Image:Celingmexico.gif
Unencyclopedic. Just a joke. Thebestkiano 19:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Groves.jpg
Unencyclopedic. Simply some image of some guy taking a picture of himself while snorkeling. BlackBear 23:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not needed. Acalamari 16:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Sa-homepage90207.png
- CV - Picture is a screenshot of a copyrighted webpage in high resolution. If the reader wants to view the webpage, they can just as easily click the website link right above the image without provoking copyright issues. Image has not been released into the public domain by Something Awful or its operators. — Cumulus Clouds 04:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC).
- Delete per the nominator. Acalamari 16:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per the nomination. disastrophe 12:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Jesus Christ you guys are Nazi's.
[edit] Image:Playboy_Jul_06_Vida_Guerra.jpg
- Jaysscholar (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Unnecessay image of a playboy cover. It's used simply to mention that a given model was featured in the one of the magazine's issue. The image itself is not notable and doesn't seem to add any noteworthy information that isn't already covered by text only. Abu badali (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE - Unneeded picture, please remove. LifeStar 19:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Decisiones042.jpg
- No verifiable source information provided to backup the claim that this is a promotional image. This sems like an image from some website. We would need to read the site's "terms of use" to know what use the copyright holder intended for this image, so that we could claim that our use don't replace the original market value for this image (WP:FUC#2) (the "original market value" could be, for instance, to increase the value of the copyright holder's website) Abu badali (talk) 01:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This is a title card from a Spanish-language TV serie. Complete rationale on imahe page. Yakuman (数え役満) 02:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry my ignorance, but what exactly is a "title card"? This seems to be an image from some website, and the concerns I posted in the nomination would apply. --Abu badali (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Madreluna041.jpg
- same case as above . --Abu badali (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep This low-res, monochrome image was specifically created to promote an upcoming TV series. Yakuman (数え役満) 02:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- When/where was this image released as promotional material? --Abu badali (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Oakham_School.png
- Oakham_School.png - obsoleted by Oakham_School.svg
- Keep and delete Image:Oakham School.svg as it fails the Wikipedia:Fair use criteria, specifically criterion no. 3 that states that "The amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible. Low-resolution images should be used instead of high-resolution images (especially images that are so high-resolution that they could be used for piracy)...." --Iamunknown 22:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Oakham_School_Logo_BW.gif
- Oakham_School_Logo_BW.gif - obsoleted by Oakham_School.svg
- Delete both, the latter fails the Wikipedia:Fair use criteria, specifically criterion no. 3 that states that "The amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible. Low-resolution images should be used instead of high-resolution images (especially images that are so high-resolution that they could be used for piracy)...." They should be obsoleted by Image:Oakham School.png. --Iamunknown 22:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Iamunknown. Acalamari 16:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Police_with_seized_dynamite.jpg
- Non-notable image from Associated Press (AP). Please, consider speeding it. Abu badali (talk) 02:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bolivian_miners_protest.jpg
- Unnecessary non-notable image from press agency Associated Press (AP) Abu badali (talk) 02:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I would say that image is anything but "non notable" Cumulus Clouds 04:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Do you know of any published commentary about this image? Or has it won some award? --Abu badali (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Protesting_miners_light_dynamite.jpg
- Unnecessary non-notable image from press agency Associated Press (AP). Abu badali (talk) 02:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:La_Paz_riot_police_during_Water_Wars.jpg
- Unnecessary non-notable image from press agency Associated Press (AP) Abu badali (talk) 02:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Waiting_coca_farmers.jpg
- Unnecessary non-notable image from press agency Associated Press (AP) Abu badali (talk) 02:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Father_Obermaier.jpg
- Unnecessary unfree image from The New York Times Abu badali (talk) 02:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:41236014_ap_evo_mbeki220.jpg
- Unnecessary non-notable unfree image from press agency Associated Press (AP) Abu badali (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:121205_MickievsVictoira_002_0001.jpg
- Images with tv logo's in are against copyright. Govvy 11:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Daisy wall 1.jpg
- Unencyclopaedic entry about a non-notable person who was a school champion in hockey — Simply south 14:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC).
- Keep - Cute Cumulus Clouds 22:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Stoned_person.jpg
- GarconDansLeNoir (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- This is probably a joke, see discussion. Image was removed from article Cannabis_(drug) anyway — Ratfox 15:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Image:Queen Bicycle Race.png
- Duplicate to Image:Queen Bicycle Race1.png— evrik (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC).
-
- This image was uploaded because Image:Queen Bicycle Race1.png did not have a source. And also because it does not have the 1 in the title.— miketm - Queen WikiProject - 17:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- The numeral 1 is there to differentiate it from Image:Queen Bicycle Race2.png. --evrik (talk) 18:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Soonymoore.jpg
- Orphan & Unencyclopedic image file that was apparently uploaded for a vanity page that is also now listed for deletion. — LifeStar 17:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Roselyn_sanchez_026.jpg
- Rastamania (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- no evidence this was released as gfdl. Abu badali (talk) 19:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Duh.png
- Parody of advertisement icons licensed by Microsoft (under an unknown license) in yesteryears. It uses the Internet Explorer logo and is thus un-free. It could be used under fair use under parody, but since it is only used on a user page, such a rationale would be insufficient justification per Wikipedia policy.- Iamunknown 19:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ottomugshot.jpg
- Useless nonsense pic --EEMeltonIV 20:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Sheepshank.png
- orphaned image, and replaced by Sheepshank.svg on commons User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Lufbra.JPG
- orphaned image, absent uploader. Another image, Hazlerrigg Front Lawn.JPG currently exists and is in use in the appropriate article. While I have no reason to doubt the licence, there was some question when uploaded and the alternative image is slightly better sourced. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Trafalgardetail_legoland_Copyright2003KTai.jpg
- orphaned image. The uploader added a GFDL tag, but in the text added with the image it states, "Copyright © 2003 Kaihsu Tai". The uploader and copyright holder appear to be one and the same. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment, it is not inappropriate to apply a label to images one uploads in the form "Copyright © 2007 MY-NAME". Content licensed under the GFDL license is still copyrighted, but licensed copy-left so that anyone can use it for commercial reuse and derivative works for free provided they attach a copy of the GFDL text and attribute the authors. So we should not automatically assume that this image is incorrectly licensed. Assuming that the uploader is also the copyright holder, I wonder if he or she knows what others can do with GFDL-licensed content. Further discussion is necessary. --Iamunknown 22:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- I will upload it to Wikimedia Commons. One has to understand that GFDL is not public domain: I still should hold the copyright in order to license the content. If I disclaim my copyright, I do not have the right to license it under GFDL. Read the licence. – Kaihsu 12:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- n.b. Blue link to Commons. --Iamunknown 14:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Image:Vapepband.jpg
- orphaned image, absent uploader. Tagged as GFDL and author as Alex Ham but unsure if uploader is photogrpher nor is any other specific source provided. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Cdrom.jpg
- Poor Yorick (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, low quality. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:42nd_street.jpg
- Robert Merkel (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, low quality User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- If it's no longer needed, so be it. --Robert Merkel 01:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Now sits at Commons. --Iamunknown 14:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
-