Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 June 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion

[edit] June 28

Image:Stgbig.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Shenaro (notify). Orphaned per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.shoptogive.us

Image:BCS national championship trophy and Bevo.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Johntex (notify). Fair use is {{tv-screenshot}}, but it is being used in College football, Bevo (mascot), NCAA Division I-A national football championship, ~~Trophy~~, 2005 Texas Longhorn football team, ~~User:Johntex/Gallery01~~, College football on television, ~~User talk:Scm83x/archive1~~, and 2005 NCAA Division I-A football season. Basically, it is being used for everything other than "for identification and critical commentary on the station ID or program and its contents" and, as such, could not be considered fair use. BigDT 01:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

My original intention was to use the image as an indication of how the media presented information on the BCS championship and its corresponding trophy. However, the broadcast was equally a commentary on the Texas Longhorns chances of winning that championship - which they did in fact win. Therefore, I think it is entirely fitting for those articles. It happens that our information on that event is spread out over several articles. The photo does not appear in all those articles, just some of them. The addition to college football on television is more recent but certainly fitting. I agree the image should not be in the User space. I will link-image it in those two locations. In short, there is a need to tidy up usage here, but there is not a need to delete this image. Thank you , Johntex\^talk 01:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

I have now removed the image from the User pages and tightened up the wording in each of the other articles to ensure the picture is well referrenced. I would like to remind everyone that this is a single frame of a 3 hour broadcast and is a degraded image by virtue of it being a photo taken of a television. It is used for educational purposes and doe not interfere with the commercial rights of the copyright holder. Johntex\^talk 14:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Followup: Johntex and I have discussed the use of this image some on my talk page and his talk page. We feel that a smaller version of the image would probably be ok on college football on television and thus, it probably should not be deleted outright. Would another user with experience in image copyright issues be willing to examine the other uses and offer an opinion as to whether those uses constitute fair use? BigDT 15:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you BigDT. I have also removed the image from trophy, because that article does not discuss the specific trophy in the photo but rather trophies in general. Johntex\^talk 15:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Not deleted. howch e ng {chat} 22:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:EvaSig.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by leethal (notify). OR, UE- — pd_THOR ^{| =/\= | 01:22, 28 June 2006 (UTC)}

Image:Colage1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Junebug2006 (notify). CV Collage of magazine covers. We can't claim fair use.- Abu Badali 02:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Colage2.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Junebug2006 (notify). CV Another collage of magazine covers. We can't claim fair use- Abu Badali 02:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ryan Karben.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Avraham (notify). OR, OB, replaced by Image:Ryan Karben.PNG Avi 02:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ok2.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Tenaciousd (notify). UE OR

Image:Etheriaherans.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Kyupayb (notify). CV. One of a number of suspected copyright violations in the Etheria article. Source used is a rather large page, and the only copyright notice on the page says All rights reserved. © 2004-2006. User notified. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 03:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Etheria sanggre.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Fitz (notify). CV. One of a number of suspected copyright violations in the Etheria article. Source used is a rather large page, and the only copyright notice on the page says All rights reserved. © 2004-2006. User notified. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 03:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Charles ng.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Ex0pos (notify). no source- Shizhao 05:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Mugshots are public records. I've replaced the tag with the updated "mugshot" tag. Ex0pos 17:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Not deleted pending discussion at Template talk:Mugshot. However, I did mark this as having no source. howch e ng {chat} 23:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:MuralLastTango.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Machocarioca (notify). CV Seems like a collage of two movie posters. If it's so, we can't claim fair use as it's a derivative work.- Abu Badali 05:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Not deleted. Derivative works are still allowed under fair use. It seems stupid to say that if these posters are in separate image files then they can be included under a fair use exception, but when they're combined it's no good. howch e ng {chat} 23:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:3 si jumatate.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Tataie (notify). seems entirely unencyclopaedic. Not in use. I@n ≡ talk 05:40, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Romjin-StamosFF.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by MMachocarioca (notify). CV It's a cropped version of a movie poster. We can't make derivative works from images used under fair uses claims- Abu Badali 06:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

- Delete. While you can crop images and still have fair use, the fair use of a movie poster does not extend to using in an article about one of the actresses. Good catch. Stifle (talk) 09:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
  - Can we make a dertivative work (e.g. crop) from a image used under fair use and still claim fair use? Now that's new to me. --Abu Badali 22:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
    - I don't know about derivative works in general, but cropping an image to show only the relevant part probably strengthens a claim of fair use. It's like using only a phrase or a sentence from a book rather than an entire chapter, or using a 30-second clip of a song rather than the whole thing. The third factor to be considered when evaluating a fair-use claim is "the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole" (see Wikipedia:Fair use), so using a small portion of the copyrighted work is better than using the whole thing. —Bkell (talk) 00:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
      - It makes complete sense to me. I feel stupid for not having followed this line of though by myself. Thanks for making this clear to me. The only fair use problem with that image is that it was being used to illustrate the article on the actress and not the movie, as Stifle pointed. --Abu Badali 01:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Sports City sig.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Silversword55 (notify). Orphan, unencyclopedic —Bkell (talk) 07:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sports City 468X60.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Silversword55 (notify). Orphan, unencyclopedic —Bkell (talk) 07:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sports City Banner.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Silversword55 (notify). Orphan, unencyclopedic —Bkell (talk) 07:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:BBH.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Silversword55 (notify). Orphan, unencyclopedic —Bkell (talk) 07:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Affilitebutton.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Silversword55 (notify). Orphan, unencyclopedic —Bkell (talk) 07:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:BackgroundBBH.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Silversword55 (notify). Orphan, unencyclopedic —Bkell (talk) 07:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Untitled 5.jpg (talk | delete)