User talk:Ilyag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This user enjoys the back-and-forth discussions among Wikipedia editors. Please use this page to communicate with him.

Contents

[edit] Bill O'Reilly (commentator)

Please don't remove the tags indicating the bias and corruption in the O'Reilly article. See talk page. Fluterst 07:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. In the mean time, I have requested for moderator arbitration. Please stop editing the article in the mean time. Additionally, you have no authority to add moderator warnings to my Talk page. --Ilyag 07:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
I'm glad you agree. Is there a rule that suggests I cannot edit the article. Please point me to it, if there is. I did not add a moderator warning, I added the only vandalism warning I could find, which I think is appropriate from what I've read. I didn't make the charge of vandalism lightly, nor do I withdraw it. Fluterst 08:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
You can edit your article provided that there is concensus. If your edits aren't questioned, you can assume you have it. Or, if someone questions your edits (as is the case with the Bill O'Reilly article), you must build concensus in the Talk pages before your edits are allowed by the rest of the editing community. If no concensus is reached, what will happen is exactly what you're seeing happen: You make edits, and someone reverts them, over and over and over again. This is clearly not how Wikipedia is meant to function. --Ilyag 08:06, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia's "consensus" has created an article full of unsourced and libellous claims against O'Reilly that is written from an obviously left-wing perspective desperate to characterize O'Reilly as a right-winger. This is not clearly not how anything holding itself out as an encyclopedia is meant to function. Fluterst 08:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC) In future if you wish to respond, please do so on my talk page as I won't be checking back in. Fluterst 08:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Can you provide some sort of justification for removing the entire section discussing criticism of O'Reilly by Keith Olbermann? The section seemed somewhat POV but the information didn't seem unworthy of inclusion. Please leave a note on the article talk page and justify the removal or I'm going to give it a little re-write to maintain NPOV and consider re-adding it. --ABQCat 23:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Bill_O'Reilly_(commentator)#Keith_Olberman
Thank you. On reading your rationale for removing the section, you've actually convinced me. The information probably *is* far more apropriate for an Olberman article than for the O'Reilly article. I appreciate your quick response! Keep up the good work! --ABQCat 23:16, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration

Could you add some diffs to your statement to back up some of your claims please? Cheers. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:41, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Done.

[edit] Battlestar Galactica

Please check out my comment in the discussion section of the BSG article. (Revised series)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Paul_verhoeven.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul_verhoeven.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 23:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


Not sure how this works too well...but I saw that you considered yourself partly "moderate libertarian." I would like to get your feedback on a site I am starting - http://www.themoderatelibertarian.com. Thanks

[edit] Image:Oreilly alt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oreilly alt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 18:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../i/l/y/User_talk%7EIlyag_7434.html"