Talk:Ikki Kita

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Fascism, an attempt to better organize and unify articles relating to the fascist ideology, its impact on history and present-day organizations closely linked to both of these (ideology and history). See project page, and discussion.

This article may be listed on an index of fascist movements or people. Such listing may be controversial; feel free to contribute to discussions there. The presence of this Talk page-only template only implies that the subject is of interest to the associated WikiProject.

Ikki Kita is part of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

[edit] See also links

I removed these. While Kita Ikki may have influenced them, These links should only be included if there is evidence that Kita Ikki either was a member or if these groups quoted him in their programs. -- Mkill 17:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Kita Ikki was the ideological sponsor of the Imperial Way, or Kodo, faction, and thus the link between him and the kodo-ha (NOT koda-ha, by the way), should be restored.- [Non User]—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.107.152.170 (talk • contribs) 14:59, 2 March 2006.

[edit] Passive Voice

I think there is too much passive voice in this article. For example, interested editors need to rewrite the fragment "...are believed to be one..." to specify who believes this, when they believed it, why is it important that they believe it, and provide a source. Also rewrite the sentenct that starts with "Many argue...." who are these people arguing and why are their arguments importants. Rewrite "it appears that..." to whom does this appear? Thanx.TheRingess 06:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)