Talk:IC50
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] IC50 - important concept - flawed definition
I'm not sure how wikipedia works, but this definition is so poorly done that it warrants being strongly edited or pulled. Minimally, it should be a one line (simple) definition, with cross-reference/citation to the work of an authority in this area. More than that, the person writing should be an expert. Prof D
--
Improved the article to be more helpful. Moved most arcane paragraph to the end. I think this does its job now, alhtough it could certainly be improved/expanded...Teloscientist 21:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)