Hystricomorpha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:How to read a taxobox
How to read a taxobox
Hystricomorpha
Fossil range: Eocene - Recent
Laotian Rock Rat
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Suborder: Hystricomorpha
Brandt, 1855
Families

Ctenodactylidae
†Tammquammyidae
Diatomyidae
†Yuomyidae
†Chapattimyidae
Tsaganomyidae
†"Baluchimyinae"
Hystricidae
Myophiomyidae
Diamantomyidae
Phiomyidae
Kenyamyidae
Petromuridae
Thryonomyidae
Bathyergidae
Bathyergoididae
Erethizontidae
Dasyproctidae
Agoutidae
Eocardiidae
Dinomyidae
Caviidae
Octodontidae
Ctenomyidae
Echimyidae
Myocastoridae
Capromyidae
Heptaxodontidae
Chinchillidae
Neoepiblemidae
Abrocomidae

Skull of a capybara showing the enlarged infraorbital canal present in most members of the Hystricomorpha. This condition is termed hystricomorphy.
Skull of a capybara showing the enlarged infraorbital canal present in most members of the Hystricomorpha. This condition is termed hystricomorphy.

The term Hystricomorpha has had many definitions throughout its history. In the broadest sense it refers to any rodent (except dipodoids) with a hystricomorphous zygomasseteric system. This includes the Hystricognathi, Ctenodactylidae, Anomaluridae, and Pedetidae. Molecular and morphological results suggest that the inclusion of the Anomaluridae and Pedetidae in Hystricomorpha may be suspect. Based on Carleton and Musser (2005), these two families are treated here as representinga distinct suborder Anomaluromorpha.

The modern definition of Hystricomorpha also known as Entodacrya or Ctenohystrica is a taxonomic hypothesis uniting the gundis with the hystricognath rodents (Carleton and Musser, 2005). There is considerable morphological support for this relationship and strong molecular support. If true, this hypothesis renders the traditional view of Sciurognathi invalid as it becomes a paraphyletic group.

[edit] Families

The following list of families is based on the taxonomy of Marivaux et al. (2002; 2004) who subjected a number of early fossil rodents to parsimony analysis and recovered support for the Hystricomorpha or Entodacrya hypothesis. Their results rendered the suborder Sciuravida as defined by McKenna and Bell (1997) to be polyphyletic and invalid. The symbol "†" is used to indicate groups where no living members survive.

[edit] References

  • Carleton, M. D. and G. G. Musser. 2005. Order Rodentia. Pp745-752 in Mammal Species of the World A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder eds.). Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Huchon, D. E. J. P. Douzery. 2001. From the Old World to the New World: A molecular chronicle of the phylogeny and biogeography of hystricognath rodents. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20:238-251.
  • Landry, S. O. J. 1999. A proposal for a new classification and nomenclature for the glires. Mitt. Mus. Nat. Kd. Berl. Zool. Reihe, 75:283-316.
  • Marivaux, L., M. Vianey-Liaud, and J.-J. Jaeger. 2004. High-level phylogeny of early Tertiary rodents: dental evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 142:105-134.
  • Marivaux, L. J. L. Welcomme, M. Vianey-Liaud, and J.J. Jaeger. 2002. The role of Asia in the origin and diversification of hystricognathous rodents. Zoologica Scripta, 31:225-239.
  • McKenna, Malcolm C., and Bell, Susan K. 1997. Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York, 631 pp. ISBN 0-231-11013-8
In other languages