User talk:Hypernick1980
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Fred Meyer
Do not post libel and other personal information against current or former users of Wikipedia. Do not make excessive Reverts in order to protect your libelous postings.
- Hold on just a second, what libel did I post. I stated that the information presented by this former member were false, I never violated the three revert rule, and I was not the only person that reverted the information. Hypernick1980 05:49, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Posting that the user whom posted the information is in "violation of Wikipedia policies" is libel and personal information. If you felt that the accuracy of the information was incorrect, you could have stated just that -- that you believed it was false, rather than make excessive reverts in an attempt to assasinate the credibility of the user.
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Saltpalace2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Saltpalace2.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Nv8200p (talk) 02:36, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] KTVX
You have received this message because you have edited a Salt Lake City media article in the past. We have recently had an edit war regarding the wording and inclusion of a paragraph on the KTVX article. In hopes of resolving this I have put together an informal survey. If you are interested, please stop by Talk:KTVX and add a vote. Thanks, A 09:20, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
re: your recent edit. That topic has been discussed on Wiki, in several areas, and resolved to read List of religions once classed as cults. Please see that article. Best wishes. WBardwin 06:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Wikipedia equals group concensus. After long -- very long -- discussions on a variety of articles, this is where the LDS movement has been placed in Wiki. You may not agree. That is fine. On List of groups referred to as cults it reads Inclusion of a group within this list is dependent upon that group being labelled a "cult" or "sect" by one or more of the listed sources. It does not imply that it has been proved, in any manner, that that group is a "cult" or "sect". Definitions, sources, and materials can all be cited, but Wikipedia's efforts are toward NPOV. True neutrality may be unattainable on religious articles, and that topic is often debated here as faith and a religion's place in the cosmos cannot be proven. But, your assertion probably belongs on the talk page at List of religions once classed as cults, where you can interact with editors involved in those discussions. Best wishes. WBardwin 06:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AT&T
First of all, I did wait a week to gather a concensus. I waited even longer. Second, the page has been split, so why did you wit until now to say you oppose the split? aido2002 19:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Look, the articles need to be split, and they were. And now that you started the unessicary voting on it, you'll see that HARLDY ANYONE DISAGREES! That's it! I resplit the articles, and would appriciate it if you stop trying to rejoin them! Why should they be rejoined? aido2002 06:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Checkuser complete
You made a request for a Checkuser to be run, which has now been completed. See Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser#Completed_requests for the results. the wub "?!" 22:26, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Call for Ogden-area Wikipedians
Hypernick1980, I am a reporter for the Standard-Examiner and am doing a story about those in our community who contribute to the Wikipedia. Would you be willing to be interviewed for the article. Please contact me at jmuhlestein@standard.net and let me know if you are willing to talk to me. Thanks.
