Talk:Hyde, Greater Manchester
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to places in the UK. If you wish to contribute you can visit the project page where there are resources & guidelines, to do lists and discussions. | |
| This article has been rated "start" on the Wikipedia Version 1.0 quality scale. | ||
|
On the project page you can find detailed guides on how to write about counties and settlements, as well as where to find statistics, references and other useful things. Additionally, the following have been identified as specific improvements this article needs:
|
||
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move article at this time. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Hyde, Greater Manchester → Hyde — as will be seen from the links to Hyde most refer to the place in Gtr Manchester that is better known than all others
Copied from WP:RM. I'm not the originator of this request, Saga City submitted the request, but did not add templates to talk page. Bobblehead 23:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
- Oppose - Too many Hydes and this one isn't so far ahead of the rest. Leave as is. -- Beardo 02:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - There are a large amount of Hydes on the disambiguation and Hyde can mean primarily one thing or another to too many people. Regan123 17:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per above: not a primary topic. - Evv 20:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - too many other Hydes to assume a searcher would be looking for this Hyde rather than one of the others. I have reverted the move of Hyde to return to the staus quo pending the resolution of this RM. BlueValour 23:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose most moves of British cities with unambiguous titles to ambiguous titles. Voretustalk 15:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose because I don't know if there are any more cities, and per Cork. With this many names, it should be a disambig (and is this the most common city by the name?) Patstuarttalk|edits 15:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - same argument as everyone else! Waggers 09:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
