Talk:Hurricane Greta-Olivia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones.

	This article is part of WikiProject Central America, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to the Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Todo

The "comparisons to other storms" section seems a bit dangling. Maybe it should be merged under "Preparations" or some such. Also there are a number of small grammar mistakes. Jdorje 04:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Storm Path

The storm path showed a northward movement 15.7N 93E to 16N 93E. However, if you check the best best track data, these two positions were both taken at 09/20/00Z. I think either one of the positions is better. Momoko

I think the latter is better. In the EPAC Best Track, it lists Olivia's first position at 16 and 93 at the same time of Greta's last position. Hurricanehink 13:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I don't see this as a particular problem. Since it was a depression its center of circulation was not particularly well defined. The only problem is that two positions are given for the same time, but this is not much of a problem since they largely overlap each other anyway. If anything, this complaint should be sent to the NHC since obviously their best-track datasets should no conflict like this. — jdorje (talk) 03:13, 17 April 2006 (UTC)