Talk:Hurricane Adrian (2005)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Tropical cyclones, which collaborates on tropical cyclones and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance within WikiProject Tropical cyclones. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Central America, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to the Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Anyone for a merge?
This storm wasn't that notable. Landfall in Central America and 3 deaths are the only things setting this storm apart. The article is a little shallow but pretty good. I'm leaning merge though. -- Hurricane Eric archive -- my dropsonde 03:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Revisit this later, but right now I think it should stay here. Very rare path, only landfall ever in western Honduras, fears of a repeat of Mitch, etc. --Golbez 04:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Keep. Only notable storm in the season, and the article is well-written. bob rulz 05:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Keep, but only because of the track. There aren't that many EPAC articles, though I think this should get Hurricane Adrian (2005), not the main page. What if in 6 years Adrian is destructive? Hurricanehink 19:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Then we'll redirect this one to Hurricane Adrian (2005). 2011 is a long ways off. I don't think we have to worry about that at the moment. bob rulz 01:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- How about a move instead of a redirect, that would be much easier. -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 01:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- That works. I just thought the format was the main article is for retired/extremely important/used once, and all others got the year notifier. Hurricanehink 02:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I agree. This page has to be moved because this Adrian isn't gonna be retired; It killed fewer people than the previous Adrian. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 01:10, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
[edit] Todo
Actually a pretty complete article, except for a few missing crucial items. It needs a see also section, "preparations" and "impact" should be split, and more on impact is needed. Jdorje 20:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- some links;
íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 02:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
How's the article now? íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 18:28, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- ... íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 00:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Is this a B. I think it's pretty decent for a minor storm in an area with little info. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 00:03, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- It might be, but has anyone seen if there are any useful Spanish links? One more thing that should be added in the article is another image, maybe one of it at landfall? The storm history needs to be sourced, and preferibly updated using the TCR. Mentioning the monthly report isn't useful. The article doesn't even mention that Adrian weakened to a tropical depression before landfall, which is a must. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- More lede and inline sources are needed. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unusual track
Is it possible to place two diagrams in this section to show what is unusual about it's track? While the text may be accurate, it is still a bit hard to visualise. PrometheusX303 00:10, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- Agreed, since no one had added a track map for the storm. Storm05 17:05, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
