Talk:Human position
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] study says straight posture is the worst, contrary to article
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15939377/
[edit] stuff
I'm not sure this article is entirely serious, but I added "down" to
For sleeping and sexual activities one often lies
because otherwise it's really only true of the second.
I'm not sure squatting in a moving vehicle is as bad as portrayed either; I've squat in the subway a number of times without noticing any particular stability problems. --Charles A. L. 19:27, Nov 24, 2003 (UTC)
What about sleeping posture? 70.111.251.203 13:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
This article is just weird. Is it serious? Devoblue 10:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
The info in basic human positions is obvious common sense, not encyclopedic. Needs to be replaced with biomechanics. Cayte 22:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)Cayte
[edit] external link to Sitting Pretty book review
as a newbie, the link to the book review seems odd - uninformative advertising.
[edit] related links?
Why does this article link to lodging? Its not related at all as far as I can tell.
- The bit about sleeping sitting etc. is related.--Patrick 22:27, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
The picture is not erect posture. It is an exaggerated arch for dramatic effect Cayte 20:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Cayte
i tried adding info and was "rejected" by eagle for "self-promoting." too bad, because the quality of info i linked to would have added value to this forum. furthermore, i've seen DOZENS of wiki pages with external links leading to product pages; so, apparently the policy for such matters isn't clear and/or simply not effective.
[edit] Prominent people
I think this section should be removed unless their posture can be evaluated by an expert. Being photogenic . doesn't guarantee good alignment.
