Talk:Hugo "Hurley" Reyes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hugo "Hurley" Reyes article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
This page falls within the scope of the Lost WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve all Wikipedia articles relating to Lost. All information on future developments needs to follow the Lost policy regarding sources. Episode articles must comply with the Lost television series guidelines.
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia The spoken word version of this article is part of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, an attempt to produce recordings of Wikipedia articles. To participate, visit the project page.
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] encyclopedic

all he must do is rub his ginormous rump against the bark of the palm tree (see barking). The tree then falls over due Hurley's extreme weight. In this manner, Hurley gains sexual gratification from the barking, and the camp gains coconuts. Everyone wins, except of course the tree.

This should be changed to something more encyclopedic or removed. Yincrash 01:49, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Lol that was meant to be a joke, I think. Hurley doesn't really do that141.195.156.132 22:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comment

Per Hurley's second revelation to Charlie that he is a multi-millionaire (in Everybody Hates Hugo), specifically $156 million I thought that number was better suited to be placed under profession--since the $114 million would just be initial winnings. Though I thought that the accountant said that he had doubled his money--I need to dig out the DVDs and check for sure to see what the original number was and what was said. Black Wolff 03:21, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry; I took the number out entirely, as it's not really crucial info in "profession", beyond noting that he's a multi-millionaire. The specific amount can be addressed (if desired) in the article body, or in the episode description-- although my view is that the exact number of millions Hurley won/is worth isn't meaningful, other than being a big 'ol chunk of change. LeFlyman 03:48, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
No, don't apologize, it actually looks much better this way, ;). I just updated the number because I though that 156 was better than 114, I didn't think of typing it like it is now--'tis a good change. Black Wolff 13:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Why does Hurley have the nickname Hurley? --81.103.58.81 23:26, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

We haven't found out yet. —Josiah Rowe 04:53, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Can we assume that the box company Hurley owns in Tuscin is the same box company Locke works for?

Yes. If I remember correctly this was verified on an official podcast.Black Wolff 15:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Photo

Some idiot keeps uploading and overwriting the real Jorge Garcia photo with someone he seems to want to make fun of. I can't get in to upload the correct version of the file, but if someone else could (go to the image page - upload new version) I would be very grateful.

ThanksHongshi 15:54, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moving to Hugo Reyes

I suggest moving the page to Hugo Reyes or Hurley. Nicknames in the middle of the article name are not really useful, and make the article harder to search. -- ReyBrujo 20:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

  • I think it is fine as it is. Some people, like yourself, would prefer his name. So would prefer his nick name. What we have is a good half way house. codu (t/c) 12:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] this should be removed

"Reyes serves as the show's comic relief." Completely subjective and unsubstantiated Statement. Furthermore, given the typical nature of his flashbacks, i dont think this is true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.182.145.167 (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC).